Saturday, October 5, 2013

2 articles from Jehovah's Witness blog.com from September of 2013

Login close  Jehovah's Witness BlogHomeBlogAboutContactIt’s About Time!
Time plays a crucial role in the Watchtower religion. In this article we are going to examine how the concept of time is twisted by the Watchtower in an attempt to absolve Jehovah from the sin of telling the first lie. Back to the Beginning Let’s go back to the beginning (or very nearly the [& [...]
Do You Trust the Governing Body?
At that time, the lifesaving direction that we receive from Jehovah’s organization may not appear practical from a human standpoint. All of us must be ready to obey any instructions we may receive, whether these appear sound from a strategic or human standpoint or not. Now is the time for any who [...]
Will Jehovah’s Witnesses Populate Other Planets?
When I was growing up as a Jehovah’s Witness, I had to sit through a weekly Bible Study. This unfortunate weekly waste of my time was carried out by a lovely brother, Richard Baptiste. Richard was (and probably still is) great, which is a shame as I really put him through his paces. You see, [ [...]
PrevNext123Exposing the truth
about Jehovah's Witnesses
JW Beliefs
Cult
JW Leadership
Real Life Experiences
Funnies
Jehovah's Witness Blog » Watchtower Bloopers » Do You Trust the Governing Body?
Do You Trust the Governing Body?
Submitted by Steve on September 1, 2013 - 11:12 am 10 Comments Do Jehovah's Witnesses trust the Governing Body?At that time, the lifesaving direction that we receive from Jehovah’s organization may not appear practical from a human standpoint. All of us must be ready to obey any instructions we may receive, whether these appear sound from a strategic or human standpoint or not.
Now is the time for any who may be putting their trust in secular education, material things, or human institutions to adjust their thinking. The elders must stand ready to help any who may now be wavering in their faith. - Watchtower, November 15th, 2013, p.20
It’s customary, here at JWB, to poke a little gentle fun at some of the statements made by our good friends the Governing Body of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. But the quote above has stolen our thunder; it surpasses in ridiculousness any remark I might make.
For those too indoctrinated to see this, I will elaborate.
Someone is telling you to trust them even if what they tell you to do appears unsound.
They are telling you not to trust any education you may have had. (Why did you get an education anyway when they’ve been discouraging this for so long?)
They are telling you to obey any instructions you may receive from “The Organization” (though it’s unclear whether this includes local elders, or just the Governing Body.)
Doesn’t that scare you a little? It scares me a lot. But Jehovah’s Witnesses are used to this. They already sacrifice their children for unsound reasons: the blood policy, disfellowshipping and the “two witness” rule. But in such cases the Watchtower has at least attempted to justify these “instructions” through sophistry. Now they are preparing their gullible followers to “obey instructions” whether pseudo-reasoning is provided or not!
“Don’t think: Obey!”
They are saying that even if what you are told seems wrong to you, you must do it anyway! So where has personal integrity and morality gone? Out the Kingdom Hall window, that’s where.
This is exactly the sort of thing I’ve been railing against for years – and not just in this context. When people obey commands that run contrary to their own sense of right and wrong – their empathy – they are liable to commit atrocities. That’s what happens with soldiers. Soldiers are trained the same way: “Don’t think: Obey!” Then, when they are ordered to slaughter a village full of women and children they do it out of a sense of duty and displaced responsibility.
Can anyone read the above Watchtower quote without recalling – with a shudder – the Jonestown incident?
The Watchtower has come a long long way from the ideology of its founder:
The liberty or privilege of choosing, exercising our wills, is one of the grandest blessings accorded to humanity, and it is an important element in man’s likeness to his creator … the human will … includes, especially, decision in respect to the higher moralities, taking hold of questions of justice and love which affect and influence all of life’s affairs.
- Pastor Russell’s Sermons p. 755
Let each fellow servant and each member of the household of faith use his consecrated judgement in accepting or rejecting this exposition, or any other exposition we may ever offer, according to his ability or inability to recognize in it the voice of our great shepherd.
- Watchtower, 1896 p. 47
And remember that this religion claims to be based solely on the Bible. According to the Bible, did Jesus say to trust an earthly organization and blindly follow whatever instructions it issued even if they seemed wrong to you? No; here is what the Bible reports him as saying:
Why don’t you judge for yourselves what is right?
- Luke 12:57 (NIV)
Trust is something that is earned by someone who proves themselves trustworthy over time. Has the governing body done this? Has the Watchtower? Look at their history; “by their fruits you will know them.” They have an unbroken record of lies, cover-ups, responsibility-shifting, and false prophecies. Time and again they have led their followers into fatal mistakes such as claiming that vaccinations and organ transplants (and still today whole blood and platelet transfusions) were against God’s law. Only later to reverse themselves. They have not earned our trust.
Even when someone has earned our implicit trust (which the Watchtower certainly has not), our own sense of right and wrong must still prevail over anything they might order us to do. Anyone demanding such foolhardy obedience has overstepped the boundaries of common sense and human responsibility, and has thereby lost all right to our trust.
Read the quote from the November, 2013 Watchtower again. Then decide, in your heart of hearts, if you really want to belong to an organization that would issue such an outrageous statement. Are you prepared to take responsibility for your own actions, and decide–based on your inherent sense of empathy–what is right? Or will you meekly gulp down the Kool-Aid or whatever else they ask you to swallow or to do?
Tags: Governing Body, Watchtower, Watchtower November 15th 2013

    
Get Notified of
New Blog Posts by Email
Enter your email address:
     Like JWB on Facebook
Most Viewed Hot Topics Comments  No More 3 Day District Conventions?
July 12th, 2012, 09:22 AM
 Fear of Discussing Doubts
September 7th, 2012, 01:11 PM
 Candace Conti Beats the Watchtower Society!
August 27th, 2012, 09:22 PM
 The Jehovah’s Witness Cult
September 29th, 2012, 04:59 PM
 How Many Significant Trees Were in the Garden of Eden?
August 6th, 2010, 09:05 AM
 Candace Conti Beats the Watchtower Society!
August 27th, 2012, 09:22 PM
 Can You Die If You’re Perfect In Paradise?
January 9th, 2013, 01:56 PM
 No More 3 Day District Conventions?
July 12th, 2012, 09:22 AM
 Gay Jehovah’s Witness Victims
March 15th, 2012, 08:35 PM
 How Many Significant Trees Were in the Garden of Eden?
August 6th, 2010, 09:05 AM
Evie Bklyn: Why monitor you, when Jehovah sees you and will deal with you accordingly right? Why so paranoid, if... Carlos: With God’s help I am never going to stop being a Witness. I am certain of what I believe and As the... smmcroberts: Carlos, Once again you are stating as facts things you could not possibly know. Yes, I was a Witness. I... smmcroberts: Carlos, How nice that the GB decided that masturbation is “not the UNFORGIVABLE sin!”... Carlos: This really proves that you were NEVER a Witness. You pretended to be one. We do know who wrote each book of... Featured Articles
Diary of an Armageddon Survivor
Did Jesus Die on a Cross or Stake?
Guide to Jehovah's Witness Beliefs
Significant Trees in Eden?
Popular Articles
Issues with Jehovah's Witnesses
JW Dating Advice
The Evil Ted – JW Urban Legend
What do JW's Believe?
Questions From Readers
Debunking New Light
Is the Devil Using JWB?
Jehovah's Witness Funnies
Apostate Test
Jehovah's Witness Chat-up Lines
Copyright © 607 B.C.E. Jehovah's Witness Blog. Jehovah's Witness Websites | Share Your Thoughts with the JWB Community | Contact JWB | Sitemap
 Login close  Jehovah's Witness BlogHomeBlogAboutContactIt’s About Time!
Time plays a crucial role in the Watchtower religion. In this article we are going to examine how the concept of time is twisted by the Watchtower in an attempt to absolve Jehovah from the sin of telling the first lie. Back to the Beginning Let’s go back to the beginning (or very nearly the [& [...]
Do You Trust the Governing Body?
At that time, the lifesaving direction that we receive from Jehovah’s organization may not appear practical from a human standpoint. All of us must be ready to obey any instructions we may receive, whether these appear sound from a strategic or human standpoint or not. Now is the time for any who [...]
Will Jehovah’s Witnesses Populate Other Planets?
When I was growing up as a Jehovah’s Witness, I had to sit through a weekly Bible Study. This unfortunate weekly waste of my time was carried out by a lovely brother, Richard Baptiste. Richard was (and probably still is) great, which is a shame as I really put him through his paces. You see, [ [...]
PrevNext123Exposing the truth
about Jehovah's Witnesses
JW Beliefs
Cult
JW Leadership
Real Life Experiences
Funnies
Jehovah's Witness Blog » Jehovah's Witness Beliefs » It’s About Time!
It’s About Time!
Submitted by Steve on September 24, 2013 - 10:48 pm No Comment It's About Time God Did SomethingTime plays a crucial role in the Watchtower religion. In this article we are going to examine how the concept of time is twisted by the Watchtower in an attempt to absolve Jehovah from the sin of telling the first lie.
Back to the Beginning
Let’s go back to the beginning (or very nearly the beginning). When critiquing the Bible, people such as myself are quick to point out that in the book of Genesis, God lied to Adam. Jehovah told Adam that in the day he ate from the forbidden tree-of-the-knowledge-of-good-and-evil he would die:
And Jehovah God also laid this command upon the man: “From every tree of the garden you may eat to satisfaction. But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will positively die.” – Genesis 2:16-17 (NWT)
A talking serpent (“the most cautious of all the wild beasts of the field that Jehovah God had made” Genesis 3:1), in contradistinction to God’s pronouncement, told Eve that if she ate the forbidden fruit she would not die, but would become “like God: knowing good and evil:”
At this the serpent said to the woman: “YOU positively will not die. For God knows that in the very day of YOUR eating from it YOUR eyes are bound to be opened and YOU are bound to be like God, KNOWING good and bad.” – Genesis 3:4-5 (NWT)
Who Lied?
Well, if we take this story literally, both the serpent and Jehovah lied. Eve did, in fact die (eventually). Adam died too, but not in the day that he ate from the tree:
And Adam lived on for a hundred and thirty years. Then he became father to a son in his likeness, in his image, and called his name Seth. And the days of Adam after his fathering Seth came to be eight hundred years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters. So all the days of Adam that he lived amounted to nine hundred and thirty years and he died.
- Genesis 5:3-5 (NWT)
So, the only truthful statement that was made on this occasion (according to the Bible) was that they would “become like God knowing good and evil” – a statement made by the serpent, though Jehovah never contradicted this statement–in fact he affirmed it after the fact:
And Jehovah God went on to say: “Here the man has become like one of us in knowing good and bad…”
- Genesis 3:22
But, did Jehovah God really lie? The Bible elsewhere tells us that God cannot lie (Titus 1:2), so in order to save the inerrancy of the Bible, fundamentalists need to somehow make God’s statement seem not to be a lie.
Time to the Rescue!
Here is a quote from a real-life active Jehovah’s Witness trying to explain this:
“…a day to Jehovah is a thousand years. … 2 Peter 3:8….. Adam lived 930 years and died! Yep that’s within a day!” [sic] – “Anonymous Coward”
To sum up this Witness explanation: Jehovah is off the hook for saying Adam would die in the “day” he ate the forbidden fruit, because–according to something that someone claiming to be “Peter” wrote centuries later–God really meant a thousand years when he said “day.”
Here’s Why the Jehovah’s Witness Argument is Silly
1. The Bible’s First Definition
The very first instance of the Bible’s defining a word for us is when it defines the word “Day,” and it is not defined as a thousand years. It is defined as “light,” and we’re told that God himself named it:
And God began calling the light Day, but the darkness he called Night. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a first day. — Genesis 1:5
day-nightJust so there can be no confusion here, not only is the day equated with light, it is also contrasted with night (which is equated with darkness). And, as if that weren’t enough, we are also told that there was an evening and a morning in that “first day.” In what sense could a thousand-year period have “an evening and a morning?” It would be ridiculous to think that it was light for 500 years and then dark for another 500 years–but that is what it would have to have been if the first “day” were a thousand-year period.
2. Speaking so as to be understood by your hearer.
An important question is: What would Adam have thought God meant by the word “Day”? After all, God was trying to communicate an important warning to Adam, so he would’ve used words in the way Adam would understand them. Otherwise he might as well have been speaking Greek, and it wouldn’t be fair to judge Adam on whether he obeyed a warning he couldn’t comprehend.
So, when God issued his warning, would Adam have thought: “that means I’ll die within 365,000 days if I disobey”? Not likely. If God had taught Adam language, we know how he would’ve defined the word “day” to him–because we have that exact definition in Genesis 1:5: a literal Earth day replete with a morning and evening: light and darkness.
Elsewhere, in an attempt to save the inerrancy of the Bible, the Watchtower tells us that God spoke to us in a way we could understand: according to the knowledge available at the time of the writing. So, when the Bible tells us that “the Sun stood still” or that a star “stood over a house” on Earth, etc., it is just because the people of that time thought the Sun moved around the Earth and that stars were small lights stuck up in a “firmament” a short distance above their heads. To be consistent, then, God would’ve used the word “day” in the way his hearer (Adam) would’ve understood it: a literal 24 hour day: God’s own definition, rather than the definition given centuries later by whoever forged the second epistle of “Peter.”
3. Hyperbole
What is a Hyperbole?
The quote from “Peter” has always seemed to me to just be hyperbole, rather than a precise method for determining biblical time periods. The way that the Watchtower uses the quote completely ignores the context. The epistle was written to Christians who were wondering where Jesus was, since they understood him to have said, in effect: “I’ll be right back.” The writer of this epistle was telling them: “No, Jesus is not late, you just have to be patient, because God has a longer range time-plan than you think: a thousand years is like nothing to him.”
4. Inconsistencies
If the “day = 1,000 years” formula is meant to be a “key” to understanding the Bible’s use of the word “day,” then it should be used consistently, not just whenever it would save a doctrine. However–no surprise here–the Watchtower does not use it consistently.
Having touched on the “days of creation” above, it’s curious to note that the official Watchtower doctrine holds that the “days of creation” were not a thousand years each. For most of their history, this religion has held that each day of creation was 7,000 years long:
Thus we find the seventh “day” of the creative week to be seven thousand years long. On the basis of the length of the seventh “day” it is therefore reasonable to conclude that each of the other six “days” also was a period of 7,000 years.
–Watchtower 2/15/1970 p.120
They figured this out by working backwards from 1975 being “6,000 years from Adam’s creation” plus the 1,000 year “Millennium” to round out the 7th day to 7,000 years. So they decided each “creative day” must’ve been 7,000 years long. But since 1975 proved to be a dud, they have since been forced to change their tune: so now they say that each of the days is an indefinite period “thousands of years long”.
And, of course, there are instances where they admit that God speaks of a “day” as a literal 24-hour period, lest the absurdities become too pronounced. For instance, if the Israelites under Joshua’s command were supposed to march around Jericho for seven thousand years–when Jehovah told them to march for seven days–they’d still be marching (Joshua 6:2-4).
Other instances where they say that a “day” is not a thousand years are seen in the Watchtower’s circuitous manner of arriving at the year 1919 for their claimed appointment (by no less than Jesus) as the “Faithful and Discreet Slave Class.” So, let’s take a short digression to review exactly that:
The Tortuous Journey to 1919
1. Arriving at 1914
Okay, first of all you have to establish the year 1914 by taking the “seven times” of Dan. 2 and multiplying by 360 (according to the formula of “a day for a year” — and pretending that a year consists of 360 days instead of 365.) That gives you 2,520 years for the “Gentile Times” [even though in that account King Nebuchadnezzar, representing the Gentile power of that time, was off his throne for those "seven times," lost to madness and grazing like a cow in the field--we'll still pretend that the seven times represents the time when gentile kingdoms will rule the Earth before "spiritual Israel" takes over.]
The Jehovah's Witness "Seven Times" Explained
Starting at 1914, you then have to go back in time 2,520 years which brings you to 607 BCE. Now, in order for all of this to work out, you have to pretend that 607 BCE was the year that Jerusalem was destroyed [even though it is known to have occurred in 587 BCE.] Then we have to pretend that we arrived at 1914 by counting seven times from the destruction of Jerusalem in 607 BCE instead of admitting that we went the other way around.
2. Arriving at 1918
To 1914 (October, to be as precise as the Watchtower) we then add the 1,260 days (aka 42 months, or 3 1/2 years) from Revelation 11:2,3 when the “temple is trampled”. Here we use the formula: “a day = a day” to bring us to April, 1918. But nothing happened then, so we arbitrarily stretch it out a couple of months by starting the 42 months in December of 1914 instead of October. That brings us to June, 1918 when the leaders of the Watchtower were imprisoned (which is the closest thing they could find to “trampling the temple.”)
3. Arriving at 1919
To June, 1918 we add the 3 1/2 days of Rev. 11:9, only this time we pretend that a day is about 2-1/2 months (a tad more than 77 days to be precise), so that 3 1/2 days equals 9 months, which brings us to March, 1919 when the Watchtower leaders were released from prison, thus “proving” that they were judged to be the “Faithful and Discreet Slave” by none other than Jesus himself [whom I'm sure would be as surprised as the rest of us to see his parable turned into this convoluted prophecy about some ex-cons]!
So what does a “day” Mean in the Bible, According to the Watchtower?
1 day
77.14 days
360 days
1 year
1,000 years
7,000+ years
With such an extensive list it’s easy to give yourself plenty of “wiggle room” for all of your doctrines and prophecies! How could you ever be wrong [at least in your own eyes, and those of your gullible followers]? If one of the above doesn’t fit, you can easily make up yet another new meaning to keep everyone happily bewildered.
Conclusion
As we’ve seen, the Watchtower does not apply its formula of “a day equals a thousand years” consistently. Rather, they try to retrofit the meaning of a “day” in hindsight to fit their preconceived ideas. [In fact--correct me if I'm wrong--but I think the "talking serpent" story is the single instance where they actually apply the "day=1,000 years" formula.]
It’s as if I were to say that “in 10 days the stock-market will crash,” and then when it doesn’t crash until 5 years from now I turn around and say, “well, a ‘day’ meant 1/2 year in that instance,” so I was right.
According to the Bible, Adam and Eve died eventually, but not as a direct result of eating the forbidden fruit. The Bible shows that they still could’ve lived forever if only they had eaten from the tree of life (Genesis 3:22). So, it was not eating from the first tree that killed them; it was not eating from the second tree. If we take the serpent’s words in this way (which isn’t a stretch at all compared to taking Jehovah to mean a thousand years when he says a day), then the serpent was not lying: and the only liar in the little drama was Jehovah. Which I guess makes him the “father of the lie.”
It would be as if I had a very young son whom I told: “If you eat this Twinkie you will die that very day.” But a neighbor-kid tells him truthfully: “You can’t die from eating a Twinkie.” Then my son eats the Twinkie, and I lock him outside where, after several days, he dies of exposure and starvation. Then I say: “See, I told you you’d die from eating that Twinkie — within uh, a ‘day:’ as I interpret ‘days.’ Too bad for you, but the important point is that I am vindicated! I told the truth and that neighbor-kid was lying to you.”
What would you like to say to such a parent? _____________________________!!!
Now, say that to Jehovah, because time has failed to save his reputation.
BTW: I don’t recommend actually eating Twinkies–but it’s better than drinking the Kool-Aid.
Coming Soon: Does time absolve God from permitting–and instituting–evil?
Tags: 1914, 1918, 1919

    
Get Notified of
New Blog Posts by Email
Enter your email address:
     Like JWB on Facebook
Most Viewed Hot Topics Comments  No More 3 Day District Conventions?
July 12th, 2012, 09:22 AM
 Fear of Discussing Doubts
September 7th, 2012, 01:11 PM
 Candace Conti Beats the Watchtower Society!
August 27th, 2012, 09:22 PM
 The Jehovah’s Witness Cult
September 29th, 2012, 04:59 PM
 How Many Significant Trees Were in the Garden of Eden?
August 6th, 2010, 09:05 AM
 Candace Conti Beats the Watchtower Society!
August 27th, 2012, 09:22 PM
 Can You Die If You’re Perfect In Paradise?
January 9th, 2013, 01:56 PM
 No More 3 Day District Conventions?
July 12th, 2012, 09:22 AM
 Gay Jehovah’s Witness Victims
March 15th, 2012, 08:35 PM
 How Many Significant Trees Were in the Garden of Eden?
August 6th, 2010, 09:05 AM
Evie Bklyn: Why monitor you, when Jehovah sees you and will deal with you accordingly right? Why so paranoid, if... Carlos: With God’s help I am never going to stop being a Witness. I am certain of what I believe and As the... smmcroberts: Carlos, Once again you are stating as facts things you could not possibly know. Yes, I was a Witness. I... smmcroberts: Carlos, How nice that the GB decided that masturbation is “not the UNFORGIVABLE sin!”... Carlos: This really proves that you were NEVER a Witness. You pretended to be one. We do know who wrote each book of... Featured Articles
Diary of an Armageddon Survivor
Did Jesus Die on a Cross or Stake?
Guide to Jehovah's Witness Beliefs
Significant Trees in Eden?
Popular Articles
Issues with Jehovah's Witnesses
JW Dating Advice
The Evil Ted – JW Urban Legend
What do JW's Believe?
Questions From Readers
Debunking New Light
Is the Devil Using JWB?
Jehovah's Witness Funnies
Apostate Test
Jehovah's Witness Chat-up Lines
Copyright © 607 B.C.E. Jehovah's Witness Blog. Jehovah's Witness Websites | Share Your Thoughts with the JWB Community | Contact JWB | Sitemap

Steve McRoberts search results revised





Sign in 

5 of 5



Bing




Web
Images
Videos
Maps
News
More
56,600 resultsAny time





Steven K Mcroberts, Knoxville, Iowa
www.poedit.org/person/IA/Knoxville/Steven_K_Mcroberts_51617173.html
Steven Mcroberts from Knoxville, Iowa is listed to reside in zip code 50138. Steven Mcroberts has a place of residence on ** E Washington St next to Dwight Johnston.


Steven McRoberts - Track and Field Profile
www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/Athlete.aspx?AID=107185
Steven McRoberts - Track & Field stats and photos on Athletic.net


Steven Mcroberts's Photos, Phone, Email, Address - Spokeo
www.spokeo.com/Steven+Mcroberts
Steven Mcroberts's photos, phone, email, address, and public records for free! Find more about Steven Mcroberts's biography, profile, volleyball, steve mcroberts ...


Steve Mcroberts's Photos, Phone, Email, Address - Spokeo
www.spokeo.com/Steve+Mcroberts
Steve Mcroberts's photos, phone, email, address, and public records for free! Find more about Steve Mcroberts's biography, profile, tourism queensl, email, ...


TheCabin.net - Conway, Arkansas
search.thecabin.net/fast-elements.php?type=standard&profile=conway...
... and Linda McRoberts, mother of former Sugar Bear coach Steven McRoberts, ... http://thecabin.net/news/2012-10-12/sideline-uca-digs-cure-hendrix-field-hockey-


Steve McRoberts's website - Rational Compassionate Living. …
www.smmcroberts.net/index.html
Welcome to Rational Compassionate Living! This is the personal website of Steve McRoberts.


TheCabin.net - Conway, Arkansas
search.thecabin.net/fast-elements.php?querystring=mcroberts&...
UCA's McRoberts accepts volleyball post at Tulsa. Steven McRoberts, who in six years took the University...coach at the University of Alabama. McRoberts' teams …


Steve Roberts Bail Bonds - Welcome
steverobertsbailbonds.net/index.html
Established in 1974 and specializing in county, state, and federal bail bonds for all criminal charges, Steve Roberts Bail Bonds gets you or your loved one back home ...
.

Related searches for steven mcroberts net

Steve Stevens Net Worth
Derek Stevens Net Worth
Stella Stevens Net Worth
Jeremy Stevens Net Worth
Ray Stevens Net Worth
Tate Stevens Net Worth 2013
Gutter Cleaning NJ
Stevens of Maine Nets
.

1
2
3
4
5
Next



Related searches
Steve Stevens Net Worth
Derek Stevens Net Worth
Stella Stevens Net Worth
Jeremy Stevens Net Worth
Ray Stevens Net Worth
Tate Stevens Net Worth 2013
Gutter Cleaning NJ
Stevens of Maine Nets
.
Ads related to www.stevemmcroberts.net

Found — Steven Mcroberts
Spokeo.com/Steven Mcroberts
See Steven Mcroberts's Phone, Email Address, Social Profiles, and More!

Located: Anyone
InstantCheckmate.com
Information found on Anyone. Someone found in database.

We Found Steven Mcroberts
PublicRecordsNow.com
Instant-Address, Phone, Age & More Steven Mcroberts- Search Free Now

We Found Steven Mcroberts
WhitePages.com/Steven Mcroberts
Get Current Phone, Address & More. Find, Be Found, & Connect with WP!

We Found Steven Mcroberts
Advanced-People-Search.com
Instant-Address, Phone, Age & More Steven Mcroberts- Search Free Now

See your ad here »







#name#







#name#















Connect to Facebook to see what your friends know.
Learn more
Connect with Facebook




© 2013 Microsoft |
Privacy and Cookies |
Legal |
Advertise |
About our ads |
Help |
Feedback


Bing Rewards
You’ve earned a free entry to win an Xbox 360 prize pack.
Claim your entryMember login









Sign in 

5 of 5



Bing




Web
Images
Videos
Maps
News
More

Also try:Steve Stevens Net Worth·Derek Stevens Net Worth·Stella Stevens …
56,600 resultsAny time




Ad related to www.stevemmcroberts.net

Found — Steven Mcroberts | Spokeo.com
Spokeo.com/Steven Mcroberts
See Steven Mcroberts's Phone, Email Address, Social Profiles, and More!



Steven K Mcroberts, Knoxville, Iowa
www.poedit.org/person/IA/Knoxville/Steven_K_Mcroberts_51617173.html
Steven Mcroberts from Knoxville, Iowa is listed to reside in zip code 50138. Steven Mcroberts has a place of residence on ** E Washington St next to Dwight Johnston.


Steven McRoberts - Track and Field Profile
www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/Athlete.aspx?AID=107185
Steven McRoberts - Track & Field stats and photos on Athletic.net


Steven Mcroberts's Photos, Phone, Email, Address - Spokeo
www.spokeo.com/Steven+Mcroberts
Steven Mcroberts's photos, phone, email, address, and public records for free! Find more about Steven Mcroberts's biography, profile, volleyball, steve mcroberts ...


Steve Mcroberts's Photos, Phone, Email, Address - Spokeo
www.spokeo.com/Steve+Mcroberts
Steve Mcroberts's photos, phone, email, address, and public records for free! Find more about Steve Mcroberts's biography, profile, tourism queensl, email, ...


TheCabin.net - Conway, Arkansas
search.thecabin.net/fast-elements.php?type=standard&profile=conway...
... and Linda McRoberts, mother of former Sugar Bear coach Steven McRoberts, ... http://thecabin.net/news/2012-10-12/sideline-uca-digs-cure-hendrix-field-hockey-


Steve McRoberts's website - Rational Compassionate Living. …
www.smmcroberts.net/index.html
Welcome to Rational Compassionate Living! This is the personal website of Steve McRoberts.


TheCabin.net - Conway, Arkansas
search.thecabin.net/fast-elements.php?querystring=mcroberts&...
UCA's McRoberts accepts volleyball post at Tulsa. Steven McRoberts, who in six years took the University...coach at the University of Alabama. McRoberts' teams …


Steve Roberts Bail Bonds - Welcome
steverobertsbailbonds.net/index.html
Established in 1974 and specializing in county, state, and federal bail bonds for all criminal charges, Steve Roberts Bail Bonds gets you or your loved one back home ...


Stephen Mcroberts's Photos, Phone, Email, Address - Spokeo
www.spokeo.com/Stephen+Mcroberts
Stephen Mcroberts's photos, phone, email, address, and public records for free! Find more about Stephen Mcroberts's biography, profile, volleyball, douglasville ga ...


Can the Bible be God's Word?. …
smmcroberts.net/religion/fundamentalism/bible/cbgw/index.html
by Steve McRoberts. Introduction : Old Testament" or "Hebrew Scriptures" Genesis: Exodus: Leviticus: Numbers: Deuteronomy: Joshua: Judges: Ruth: 1 Samuel: 2 …


Tulsa Tabbed As C-USA Preseason Volleyball Favorite | Denton ...
www.dentonrc.com/incoming/20120817-tulsa-tabbed-as-c-usa-preseason...
IRVING, Texas - Two-time defending Conference USA champion Tulsa has been tabbed as the 2012 C-USA Volleyball Preseason favorite. The Golden Hurricane …


McRoberts lends interesting view - NCAA.com
www.ncaa.com/news/volleyball-women/article/2011-12-14/mcroberts...
Steven McRoberts' Tulsa team finished 28-7 this season. Title: McRoberts lends interesting view. Subheadline: ... especially at the net.


TheCabin.net - Conway, Arkansas - McFatrich to lead UCA …
thecabin.net/sports/college/2011-03-08/mcfatrich-lead-uca...
Mar 08, 2011 · McFatrich spent the last four seasons as an assistant coach for the Sugar Bears under Steven McRoberts, who recently accepted a position at Tulsa, ...


Tulsa Volleyball Prepares For Another Conference Title Run ...
www.newson6.com/story/19231549/tulsa-volleyball-prepares-for...
"I've saw a lot of energy and excitement about getting the season started," commented Tulsa head coach Steven McRoberts. ... to be playing a little more above the net."
.

Related searches for steven mcroberts net

Steve Stevens Net Worth
Derek Stevens Net Worth
Stella Stevens Net Worth
Jeremy Stevens Net Worth
Ray Stevens Net Worth
Tate Stevens Net Worth 2013
Gutter Cleaning NJ
Stevens of Maine Nets
.

Ad related to www.stevemmcroberts.net

Found — Steven Mcroberts | Spokeo.com
Spokeo.com/Steven Mcroberts
See Steven Mcroberts's Phone, Email Address, Social Profiles, and More!


1
2
3
4
5
Next

Ads related to www.stevemmcroberts.net

We Found Steven Mcroberts
PublicRecordsNow.com
Instant-Address, Phone, Age & More Steven Mcroberts- Search Free Now

Located: Anyone
InstantCheckmate.com
Information found on Anyone. Someone found in database.

We Found Steven Mcroberts
WhitePages.com/Steven Mcroberts
Get Current Phone, Address & More. Find, Be Found, & Connect with WP!

See your ad here »


Related searches
Steve Stevens Net Worth
Derek Stevens Net Worth
Stella Stevens Net Worth
Jeremy Stevens Net Worth
Ray Stevens Net Worth
Tate Stevens Net Worth 2013
Gutter Cleaning NJ
Stevens of Maine Nets
.






#name#







#name#















Connect to Facebook to see what your friends know.
Learn more
Connect with Facebook




© 2013 Microsoft |
Privacy and Cookies |
Legal |
Advertise |
About our ads |
Help |
Feedback




Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Wall-E film article from Wikipedia



 

#cn-toggle-box { float: right; } .wlm_2012_org_image { border: 0; float: left; margin-left: 15px; margin-top: -15px; } 
Close
 Wiki Loves Monuments: Historic sites, photos, and prizes!
WALL-E

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search 

This article is about the film. For the video game based on it, see WALL-E (video game). For the film's soundtrack, see WALL-E (soundtrack).

WALL-E
WALL-Eposter.jpg
Theatrical release poster

Directed by
Andrew Stanton

Produced by
Jim Morris

Screenplay by
Andrew Stanton
Jim Reardon

Story by
Andrew Stanton
Pete Docter

Starring
Ben Burtt
Elissa Knight
Jeff Garlin
Fred Willard
John Ratzenberger
Kathy Najimy
Sigourney Weaver
MacInTalk

Music by
Thomas Newman

Cinematography
Jeremy Lasky
 Danielle Feinberg

Editing by
Stephen Schaffer

Studio
Walt Disney Pictures
Pixar Animation Studios

Distributed by
Walt Disney Studios
 Motion Pictures

Release date(s)
•June 23, 2008 (2008-06-23) (Los Angeles)
•June 27, 2008 (2008-06-27)
 

Running time
98 minutes

Country
United States

Language
English

Budget
$180 million[1]

Box office
$521,311,860[2]

WALL-E (stylized with an interpunct as WALL·E) is a 2008 American CGI science-fiction romantic comedy film produced by Pixar Animation Studios and directed by Andrew Stanton. The story follows a robot named WALL-E, who is designed to clean up a waste-covered Earth far in the future. He falls in love with another robot named EVE, who also has a programmed task, and follows her into outer space on an adventure that changes the destiny of both his kind and humanity. Both robots exhibit an appearance of free will and emotions similar to humans, which develop further as the film progresses.
After directing Finding Nemo, Stanton felt Pixar had created believable simulations of underwater physics and was willing to direct a film set largely in space. Most of the characters do not have actual human voices, but instead communicate with body language and robotic sounds, designed by Ben Burtt, that resemble voices. It is also Pixar's first animated feature with segments featuring live-action characters.
Walt Disney Pictures released WALL-E in the United States and Canada on June 27, 2008. It grossed $23.2 million on its opening day, and $63.1 million during its opening weekend in 3,992 theaters, ranking #1 at the box office. This ranks as the fifth highest-grossing opening weekend for a Pixar film. Following Pixar tradition, WALL-E was paired with a short film, Presto, for its theatrical release.
WALL-E was met with critical acclaim, scoring an approval rating of 96% on the review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. It grossed $521.3 million worldwide, won the 2008 Golden Globe Award for Best Animated Feature Film, the 2009 Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form,[3] the final Nebula Award for Best Script,[4] the Saturn Award for Best Animated Film, and the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature as well as being nominated for five other Academy Awards at the 81st Academy Awards. WALL-E ranks first in TIME's "Best Movies of the Decade".[5]
The film is seen as a critique on larger societal issues. It addresses consumerism, nostalgia, environmental problems, waste management, the immense impact humans have on the Earth, and the direction in which the human race is headed.[6]

Contents
 [hide] •1 Plot
•2 Cast and characters
•3 Production ◦3.1 Writing
◦3.2 Design
◦3.3 Animation
◦3.4 Sound
◦3.5 Music

•4 Themes ◦4.1 Environment and Waste
◦4.2 Technology
◦4.3 Christianity

•5 Reception ◦5.1 Release
◦5.2 Box-office performance
◦5.3 Home media
◦5.4 Critical reception

•6 Accolades
•7 References
•8 Further reading
•9 External links

Plot[edit source | edit]
In 2805, Earth is covered in garbage due to decades of mass consumerism facilitated by the megacorporation Buy 'n' Large (BnL). In 2105, BnL evacuates Earth's population in fully automated starliners, leaving behind WALL-E trash compactor robots to clean the planet. Eventually BnL abandons its plan and shuts down the WALL-E robots, except for one which develops sentience after 700 years of life-experience. He manages to remain active by repairing himself using parts from other units. Apart from his regular duties, he inquisitively collects artifacts of human civilization and keeps them in his home, a storage truck.
One day WALL-E discovers a growing seedling. Later, a spaceship lands and deploys EVE, an advanced robot probe sent from the BnL starliner Axiom to search for vegetation on Earth. WALL-E falls in love with the initially cold and hostile EVE, who gradually softens and befriends him. When WALL-E brings EVE to his truck and shows her his collection, she sees the plant, automatically stores it inside herself, and goes into standby mode waiting for her ship to retrieve her. WALL-E, not understanding why EVE seems to have shut down, tries numerous methods to reactivate her, to no avail. When EVE's automated ship returns and collects EVE, WALL-E clings to its hull and thus travels through space back to the Axiom.
On the Axiom, the descendants of the ship's original passengers have become morbidly obese after centuries of relying on the ship's automated systems for their every need. The ship's 6th captain, McCrea, leaves most of the ship's operations under the control of its robotic autopilot, Auto.
WALL-E follows EVE to the bridge of the Axiom, where the Captain learns that by putting the plant in the ship's holo-detector to verify Earth's habitability, the Axiom will make a hyperjump back to Earth so the passengers can recolonize it. However, Auto orders McCrea's robotic assistant GO-4 to steal the plant as part of his own no return directive, which was issued to all BnL autopilots after the corporation incorrectly concluded in 2110 that the planet could not be saved.
With the plant missing, EVE is considered defective and taken to the repair ward along with WALL-E (for cleaning). WALL-E mistakes the process on EVE for torture and tries to save her, accidentally releasing a horde of malfunctioning robots. The on-board security systems then designate both WALL-E and EVE as "rogue robots". Angry with WALL-E's disruptions, EVE brings him to the escape pod bay to send him home. There they witness GO-4 dispose of the missing plant by placing it inside a pod which is set to "self-destruct mode". WALL-E enters the plant's pod, which is then jettisoned into space. WALL-E escapes with the plant before the pod explodes. Reconciling with EVE, they celebrate with a dance in space outside the Axiom.
The plant is brought to the captain, who surveys EVE's recordings of Earth and concludes that mankind must return to restore their ruined home. However, Auto reveals his directive and stages a mutiny. He tasers WALL-E, severely damaging him, when he tries to protect the plant. EVE realizes the only parts for repairing WALL-E are in his truck back on Earth. She helps him bring the plant to the holo-detector to activate the ship's hyperjump. McCrea opens the holo-detector and fights Auto for control of the ship. Auto partially crushes WALL-E by closing the holo-detector on him. Auto is eventually disabled by McCrea, and EVE places the plant in the holo-detector, which frees a crushed WALL-E and sets the Axiom on the instant hyperjump to Earth.
EVE brings WALL-E back to his home where she repairs and reactivates him. After the repair WALL-E no longer recognizes EVE, reverting to his original programming as an unfeeling waste compactor. Heartbroken, EVE gives WALL-E a farewell kiss that jolts WALL-E's memory, and his personality returns. WALL-E and EVE happily reunite as the humans and robots of the Axiom begin to restore Earth and its environment. During the end credits, slideshows through a series of artworks WALL-E and EVE are seen holding hands in front of a large tree, which is revealed to have grown from the tiny plant that brought humankind home.
Cast and characters[edit source | edit]
•Ben Burtt produced the voice of WALL-E (Waste Allocation Load Lifter – Earth-Class), the title character. WALL-E, a robot who has developed sentience, is the only robot of his kind shown to be still functioning on Earth. He is a small mobile compactor box with all-terrain treads, three-fingered shovel hands, binocular eyes, and retractable solar cells for power. He collects spare parts for himself, which becomes pivotal to the plot, and replaces broken and/or worn out parts on-the-fly by cannibalizing "dead" WALL-Es. Although working diligently to fulfill his directive to clean up the garbage (all the while accompanied by his cockroach friend Hal and music playing from his on-board recorder) he is distracted by his curiosity, collecting trinkets of interest. He stores and displays these "treasures" such as a birdcage full of rubber ducks, a Rubik's Cube, Zippo lighters, disposable cups filled with plastic cutlery and a golden trophy at his home where he examines and categorizes his finds while watching video cassettes of musicals via an iPod viewed through a large Fresnel lens. ◦Burtt is also credited for the voice of M-O (Microbe Obliterator), as well as most of the other robots. M-O is a tiny, obsessive compulsive maintenance robot with rollers for hands who keeps Axiom clean.

•Elissa Knight as EVE (Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator), a sleek robot probe whose directive is to locate vegetation on Earth and verify habitability. She has a glossy white egg-shaped body and blue LED eyes. She moves using antigravity technology and is equipped with scanners, specimen storage and a plasma cannon in her arm, which she is quick to use.
•Jeff Garlin as Captain B. McCrea, the commander, and apparently only officer, on the Axiom. His duties as captain are daily routines, with the ship's autopilot handling all true command functions.
•Fred Willard as Shelby Forthright, historical CEO of the Buy n Large Corporation, shown only in videos recorded around the time of the Axiom's initial launch. Constantly optimistic, Forthright proposed the evacuation plans, then to clean up and recolonize the planet. However, the corporation gave up after realizing how toxic Earth had become. Forthright is the only live action character with a speaking role, the first in any Pixar film.
•MacInTalk, the text-to-speech program for the Apple Macintosh, was used for the voice of Auto, the rogue autopilot artificial intelligence built into the ship. Unlike other robots in the film, Auto is not influenced by WALL-E, instead following directive A113, which is to prevent the Axiom and the humans from returning to Earth because of the toxicity, and he will prevent anyone from deviating from it.
•John Ratzenberger and Kathy Najimy as John and Mary, respectively. John and Mary both live on the Axiom and are so dependent on their personal video screens and automatic services that they are oblivious to their surroundings, for instance not noticing that the ship features a giant swimming pool. However, they are brought out of their trances after separate encounters with WALL-E, eventually meeting face-to-face for the first time.
•Sigourney Weaver as the voice of the Axiom's computer. Stanton joked about the role with Weaver, saying, "You realize you get to be 'Mother' now?"[7][8] referring to the name of the ship's computer in the film Alien, which also starred Weaver.[8]

Production[edit source | edit]
Writing[edit source | edit]


BACK ON M-O AND WALLY [sic]
M-O just finishes cleaning the floor.
Wally is fascinated.
Impishly makes another mark.
M-O compulsively cleans it. Can’t resist.
 M-O (bleeps): [Look, it stays clean. You got that?]
Wally wipes the bottom of his tread on M-O’s face.
M-O loses it.
Scrubs his own face.

Stanton wrote the screenplay to focus on the visuals
 and as a guide to what the sound effects needed to convey[9]

Andrew Stanton conceived WALL-E during a lunch with fellow writers John Lasseter, Pete Docter, and Joe Ranft in 1994. Toy Story was nearing completion and the writers brainstormed ideas for their next projects – A Bug's Life, Monsters, Inc., and Finding Nemo – at this lunch. Stanton asked, "What if mankind had to leave Earth and somebody forgot to turn off the last robot?"[7] Having struggled for many years with making the characters in Toy Story appealing, Stanton found his simple Robinson Crusoe-esque idea of a lonely robot on a deserted planet very strong.[10][11] Stanton made WALL-E a waste collector as the idea was instantly understandable, and because it was a low-status menial job that made him sympathetic.[12] Stanton also liked the imagery of stacked cubes of garbage.[13] He did not find the idea dark because having a planet covered in garbage was for him a childish imagining of disaster.[14]
Stanton and Pete Docter developed the film under the title of Trash Planet for two months in 1995, but they did not know how to develop the story and Docter chose to direct Monsters, Inc. instead.[15][16] Stanton came up with the idea of WALL-E finding a plant, because his life as the sole inhabitant on a deserted world reminded Stanton of a plant growing among pavements.[17] Before they turned their attention to other projects, Stanton and Lasseter thought about having WALL-E fall in love, as it was the necessary progression away from loneliness.[14] Stanton started writing WALL-E again in 2002 while completing Finding Nemo.[18] Stanton formatted his script in a manner reminiscent of Dan O'Bannon's Alien. O'Bannon wrote his script in a manner Stanton found reminded him of haiku, where visual descriptions were done in continuous lines of a few words. Stanton wrote his robot dialogue conventionally, but placed them in brackets.[11] In late 2003, Stanton and a few others created a story reel of the first twenty minutes of the film. Lasseter and Steve Jobs were impressed and officially began development,[19] though Jobs stated he did not like the title, originally spelled "W.A.L.-E."[20]
While the first act of WALL-E "fell out of the sky" for Stanton,[14] he had originally wanted aliens to plant EVE to explore Earth and the rest of the film was very different. When WALL-E comes to the Axiom, he incites a Spartacus-style rebellion by the robots against the remnants of the human race, which were cruel alien Gels (completely devolved, gelantinous, boneless, legless, see-through, green creatures that resemble Jell-O). James Hicks, a physiologist, mentioned to Stanton the concept of atrophy and the effects prolonged weightlessness would have on humans living in space for an inordinately extended time period.[7][21][22] Therefore, this was the inspiration of the humans degenerating into the alien Gels,[23] and their ancestry would have been revealed in a Planet of the Apes-style ending.[24] The Gels also spoke a made-up gibberish language, but Stanton scrapped this idea because he thought it would be too complicated for the audience to understand and they could easily be driven off from the storyline.[25] The Gels had a royal family, who host a dance in a castle on a lake in the back of the ship, and the Axiom curled up into a ball when returning to Earth in this incarnation of the story.[25] Stanton decided this was too bizarre and unengaging, and conceived humanity as "big babies".[24] Stanton developed the metaphorical theme of the humans learning to stand again and "grow[ing] up",[24][26] wanting WALL-E and EVE's relationship to inspire humanity because he felt very few films explore how utopian societies come to exist.[27] The process of depicting the descendants of humanity as the way they appear in the movie was very slow. Stanton first decided to put a nose and ears on the Gels so the audience could recognize them. Eventually, fingers, legs, clothes, and other characteristics were added until they arrived at the concept of being fetus-like to allow the audience to see themselves in the characters.[25]
In a later version of the film, Auto comes to the docking bay to retrieve EVE's plant. The film would have its first cutaway to the captain, but Stanton moved that as he found it too early to begin moving away from WALL-E's point-of-view. As a homage to Get Smart,[28] Auto takes the plant and goes into the bowels of the ship into a room resembling a brain where he watches videos of Buy n Large's scheme to clean up the Earth falling apart through the years. Stanton removed this to keep some mystery as to why the plant is taken from EVE. The captain appears to be unintelligent, but Stanton wanted him to just be unchallenged; otherwise he would have been unempathetic.[23] One example of how unintelligent the captain was depicted initially is that he was seen to wear his hat upside-down, only to fix it before he challenges Auto. In the finished film, he merely wears it casually atop his head, tightening it when he assumes real command of the Axiom.[25]
Originally, EVE would have been electrocuted by Auto, and then be quickly saved from ejection at the hands of the WALL-A robots by WALL-E. He would have then revived her by replacing her power unit with a cigarette lighter he brought from Earth. Stanton reversed this following a 2007 test screening, as he wanted to show EVE replacing her directive of bringing the plant to the captain with repairing WALL-E, and it made WALL-E even more heroic if he held the holo-detector open despite being badly hurt. Stanton also moved the moment where WALL-E reveals his plant (which he had snatched from the self-destructing escape pod) from producing it from a closet to immediately after his escape, as it made EVE happier and gave them stronger motivation to dance around the ship.[23] Stanton felt half the audience at the screening believed the humans would be unable to cope with living on Earth and would have died out after the film's end. Jim Capobianco, director of the short film Your Friend the Rat, created an end credits animation that continued the story – and stylized in different artistic movements throughout history – to clarify an optimistic tone.[29]
Design[edit source | edit]
WALL-E was the most complex Pixar production since Monsters, Inc. because of the world and the history that had to be conveyed.[10] Whereas most Pixar films have up to 75,000 storyboards, WALL-E required 125,000.[30] Production designer Ralph Eggleston wanted the lighting of the first act on Earth to be romantic, while the second act on the Axiom to be cold and sterile. During the third act, the romantic lighting is slowly introduced into the Axiom environment.[7] Pixar studied Chernobyl and the city of Sofia to create the ruined world; art director Anthony Christov was from Bulgaria and recalled Sofia used to have problems storing its garbage.[31][32] Eggleston bleached out the whites on Earth to make WALL-E feel vulnerable. The overexposed light makes the location look more vast. Because of the haziness, the cubes making up the towers of garbage had to be very large, otherwise they would have lost shape (in turn, this helped save rendering time). The dull tans of Earth subtly become soft pinks and blues when EVE arrives. When WALL-E shows EVE all his collected items, all the lights he has collected light up to give an inviting atmosphere, like a Christmas tree. Eggleston tried to avoid the colors yellow and green so WALL-E – who was made yellow to emulate a tractor – would not blend into the deserted Earth, and to make the plant more prominent.[33]

WALL-E holding a bra

WALL-E finds a bra. Roger Deakins and Dennis Muren were consulted on realistic lighting including backgrounds that are less focused than foregrounds.
Stanton also wanted the lighting to look realistic and evoke the science fiction films of his youth. He felt Pixar had captured the physics of being underwater with Finding Nemo, so for WALL-E he wanted to push that for air. It was while rewatching some of his favorite science fiction films he realized Pixar's films lacked the look of 70 mm film and its barrel distortion, lens flare and racking focus.[10] Producer Jim Morris invited Roger Deakins and Dennis Muren to advise on lighting and atmosphere. Muren spent several months with Pixar, while Deakins hosted one talk and was requested to stay on for another two weeks. Stanton said Muren's experience came from integrating computer animation into live-action settings, while Deakins helped them understand not to overly complicate their camerawork and lighting.[27] 1970s Panavision cameras were used to help the animators understand and replicate handheld imperfections like unfocused backgrounds in digital environments.[7] The first lighting test consisted of building a three-dimensional replica of WALL-E, filming it with a 70 mm camera, and then trying to replicate that in the computer.[34] Stanton cited the shallow lens work of Gus Van Sant's films as an influence, as it created intimacy in each close-up. Stanton chose angles for the virtual cameras that a live-action filmmaker would choose if filming on a set.[14]

Stanton wanted the Axiom's interior to resemble Shanghai and Dubai.[10] Eggleston studied 1960s NASA paintings and the original concept art for Tomorrowland for the Axiom, to reflect that era's sense of optimism.[7] Stanton remarked "We are all probably very similar in our backgrounds here [at Pixar] in that we all miss the Tomorrowland that was promised us from the heyday of Disneyland," and wanted a "jet pack" feel.[10] Pixar also studied the Disney Cruise Line and visited Las Vegas, which was helpful in understanding artificial lighting.[7] Eggleston based his Axiom designs on the futuristic architecture of Santiago Calatrava. Eggleston divided the inside of the ship into three sections; the rear's economy class has a basic gray concrete texture with graphics keeping to the red, blue and white of the BnL logo. The coach class with living/shopping spaces has 'S' shapes as people are always looking for "what's around the corner". Stanton intended to have many colorful signs, but he realized this would overwhelm the audience and went with Eggleston's original idea of a small number of larger signs. The premier class is a large Zen-like spa with colors limited to turquoise, cream and tan, and leads on to the captain's warm carpeted and wooded quarters and the sleek dark bridge.[33] In keeping with the artificial Axiom, camera movements were modeled after those of the steadicam.[35]
The use of live action was a stepping stone for Pixar, as Stanton was planning to make John Carter of Mars his next project.[10] Storyboarder Derek Thompson noted introducing live action meant they had to make the rest of the film look even more realistic.[36] Eggleston added that if the historical humans had been animated and slightly caricaturized, then the audience would not have recognized how serious their devolution was.[33] Stanton cast Fred Willard as the historical Buy n Large CEO because "He's the most friendly and insincere car salesman I could think of."[24] The CEO says "stay the course," which Stanton used because he thought it was funny.[37] Industrial Light & Magic did the visual effects for these shots.[7]
Animation[edit source | edit]
WALL-E went undeveloped during the 1990s partly because Stanton and Pixar were not confident enough yet to have a feature length film with a main character that behaved like Luxo Jr. or R2-D2.[11] Stanton explained there are two types of robots in cinema: "human[s] with metal skin", like the Tin Man, or "machine[s] with function" like Luxo and R2. He found the latter idea "powerful" because it allowed the audience to project personalities onto the characters, as they do with babies and pets: "You're compelled ... you almost can't stop yourself from finishing the sentence 'Oh, I think it likes me! I think it's hungry! I think it wants to go for a walk!'"[38] He added, "We wanted the audience to believe they were witnessing a machine that has come to life."[7] The animators visited recycling stations to study machinery, and also met robot designers, visited NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory to study robots, watched a recording of a Mars rover,[18] and borrowed a bomb detecting robot from the San Francisco Police Department. Simplicity was preferred in their performances as giving them too many movements would make them feel human.[7]
Stanton wanted WALL-E to be a box and EVE to be like an egg.[39] WALL-E's eyes were inspired by a pair of binoculars Stanton was given when watching the Oakland Athletics play against the Boston Red Sox. He "missed the entire inning" because he was distracted by them.[40] The director was reminded of Buster Keaton and decided the robot would not need a nose or mouth.[41] Stanton added a zoom lens to make WALL-E more sympathetic.[41] Ralph Eggleston noted this feature gave the animators more to work with and gave the robot a child-like quality.[33] Pixar's studies of trash compactors during their visits to recycling stations inspired his body.[7] His tank treads were inspired by a wheelchair someone had developed that used treads instead of wheels.[39] The animators wanted him to have elbows, but realized this was unrealistic because he is only designed to pull garbage into his body.[7] His arms also looked very flimsy when they did a test of him waving.[39] Animation director Angus MacLane suggested they attach his arms to a track on the sides of his body to move them around, based on the inkjet printers his father designed. This arm design contributed to creating the character's posture, so if they wanted him to be nervous, they would lower them.[42] Stanton was unaware of the similarities between WALL-E and Johnny 5 from Short Circuit until others pointed it out to him.[11]

From left to right, characters Auto, the captain, and EVE are pictured in a room within the Axiom ship.

Auto, the captain and EVE
Stanton wanted EVE to be at the higher end of technology, and asked iPod designer Jonathan Ive to inspect her design. He was very impressed.[10] Her eyes are modelled on Lite-Brite toys,[41] but Pixar chose not to make them overly expressive as it would be too easy to have her eyes turn into hearts to express love or something similar.[39] Her limited design meant the animators had to treat her like a drawing, relying on posing her body to express emotion.[7] They also found her similar to a manatee or a narwhal because her floating body resembled an underwater creature.[39] Auto was a conscious homage to HAL 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey, and the usage of Also sprach Zarathustra for the showdown between the captain and Auto furthers that.[11][not in citation given] The manner in which he hangs from a wall gives him a threatening feel, like a spider.[43] Originally, Auto was designed entirely differently, resembling EVE, but masculine and authoritative; the Steward robots were also more aggressive Patrol-bots.[23] The majority of the robot cast were formed with the Build-a-bot program, where different heads, arms and treads were combined together in over a hundred variations.[7] The humans were modelled on sea lions due to their blubbery bodies,[33] as well as babies. The filmmakers noticed baby fat is a lot tighter than adult fat and copied that texture for the film's humans.[44]

To animate their robots, the film's story crew and animation crew watched a Keaton and a Charlie Chaplin film every day for almost a year, and occasionally a Harold Lloyd picture.[11] Afterwards, the filmmakers knew all emotions could be conveyed silently. Stanton cited Keaton's "great stone face" as giving them perseverance in animating a character with an unchanging expression.[41] As he rewatched these, Stanton felt that filmmakers – since the advent of sound – relied on dialogue too much to convey exposition.[11] The filmmakers dubbed the cockroach WALL-E keeps as a pet "Hal", in reference to silent film producer Hal Roach (as well as being an additional reference to HAL 9000).[7] They also watched 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Black Stallion and Never Cry Wolf, films that had sound but were not reliant on dialogue.[36] Stanton acknowledged Silent Running as an influence because its silent robots were a forerunner to the likes of R2-D2,[27] and that the "hopeless romantic" Woody Allen also inspired WALL-E.[15]
Sound[edit source | edit]
Producer Jim Morris recommended Ben Burtt as sound designer for WALL-E because Stanton kept using R2-D2 as the benchmark for the robots.[28] Burtt had completed Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith and told his wife he would no longer work on films with robots, but found WALL-E and its substitution of voices with sound "fresh and exciting".[7] He recorded 2500 sounds for the film, which was twice the average number for a Star Wars film,[18] and a record in his career.[7] Burtt began work in 2005,[45] and experimented with filtering his voice for two years.[46] Burtt described the robot voices as "like a toddler [...] universal language of intonation. 'Oh', 'Hm?', 'Huh!', you know?"[47]
During production Burtt had the opportunity to look at the items used by Jimmy MacDonald, Disney's in-house sound designer for many of their classic films. Burtt used many of MacDonald's items on WALL-E. Because Burtt was not simply adding sound effects in post-production, the animators were always evaluating his new creations and ideas, which Burtt found an unusual experience.[48] He worked in sync with the animators, returning their animation after adding the sounds to give them more ideas.[7] Burtt would choose scientifically-accurate sounds for each character, but if he could not find one that worked, he would choose a dramatic if unrealistic noise.[48] Burtt would find hundreds of sounds by looking at concept art of characters, before he and Stanton pared it down to a distinct few for each robot.[10]
Burtt saw a hand-cranked electrical generator while watching Island in the Sky, and bought an identical, unpacked device from 1950 on eBay to use for WALL-E moving around.[49] Burtt also used an automobile self starter for when WALL-E goes fast,[48] and the sound of cars being wrecked at a demolition derby provided for WALL-E's compressing trash in his body.[50] The Macintosh computer chime was used to signify when WALL-E has fully recharged his battery. For EVE, Burtt wanted her humming to have a musical quality.[48] Burtt was only able to provide neutral or masculine voices, so Pixar employee Elissa Knight was asked to provide her voice for Burtt to electronically modify. Stanton deemed the sound effect good enough to properly cast her in the role.[37] Burtt recorded a flying 10-foot-long (3.0 m) radio-controlled jet plane for EVE's flying,[7] and for her plasma cannon, Burtt hit a slinky hung from a ladder with a timpani stick. He described it as a "cousin" to the blaster noise from Star Wars.[51]
MacInTalk was used because Stanton "wanted Auto to be the epitome of a robot, cold, zeros & ones, calculating, and soulless [and] Stephen Hawking's kind of voice I thought was perfect."[27] Additional sounds for the character were meant to give him a clockwork feel, to show he is always thinking and calculating.[48]
Burtt had visited Niagara Falls in 1987 and used his recordings from his trip for the sounds of wind.[50] He ran around a hall with a canvas bag up to record the sandstorm though.[7] For the scene where WALL-E runs from falling shopping carts, Burtt and his daughter went to a supermarket and placed a recorder in their cart. They crashed it around the parking lot and then let it tumble down a hill.[52] To create Hal (WALL-E's pet cockroach)'s skittering, he recorded the clicking caused by taking apart and reassembling handcuffs.[7]
Music[edit source | edit]
See also: WALL-E (soundtrack)
Thomas Newman recollaborated with Stanton on WALL-E since the two got along well on Nemo, which gave Newman the Annie Award for Best Music in an Animated Feature. He began writing the score in 2005, in the hope that starting this task early would make him more involved with the finished film. But, Newman remarked that animation is so dependent on scheduling he should have begun work earlier on when Stanton and Reardon were writing the script. EVE's theme was arranged for the first time in October 2007. Her theme when played as she first flies around Earth originally used more orchestral elements, and Newman was encouraged to make it sound more feminine.[53] Newman said Stanton had thought up of many ideas for how he wanted the music to sound, and he generally followed them as he found scoring a partially silent film difficult. Stanton wanted the whole score to be orchestral, but Newman felt limited by this idea especially in scenes aboard the Axiom, and used electronics too.[54]

WALL-E watching a clip from Hello, Dolly!

A live-action clip of the song "It Only Takes a Moment" from Hello, Dolly!, which inspires WALL-E to hold hands with EVE
Stanton originally wanted to juxtapose the opening shots of space with 1930s French swing music, but he saw The Triplets of Belleville (2003) and did not want to appear as if he were copying it. Stanton then thought about the song "Put On Your Sunday Clothes" from Hello, Dolly!, since he had portrayed the sidekick Barnaby Tucker in a 1980 high school production.[55] Stanton found that the song was about two naive young men looking for love, which was similar to WALL-E's own hope for companionship. Jim Reardon suggested WALL-E find the film on video, and Stanton included "It Only Takes a Moment" and the clip of the actors holding hands, because he wanted a visual way to show how WALL-E understands love and conveys it to EVE. Hello Dolly! composer Jerry Herman allowed the songs to be used without knowing what for; when he saw the film, he found its incorporation into the story "genius".[56] Coincidentally, Newman's uncle Lionel worked on Hello, Dolly![7]

Newman travelled to London to compose the end credits song "Down to Earth" with Peter Gabriel, who was one of Stanton's favorite musicians. Afterwards, Newman rescored some of the film to include the song's composition, so it would not sound intrusive when played.[7] Louis Armstrong's rendition of "La Vie en rose" was used for a montage where WALL-E does not get EVE's attention on Earth. The script also specified using Bing Crosby's "Stardust" for when the two robots dance around the Axiom,[9] but Newman asked if he could score the scene himself. A similar switch occurred for the sequence in which WALL-E attempts to wake EVE up through various means; originally, the montage would play with the instrumental version of "Raindrops Keep Fallin' on My Head", but Newman wanted to challenge himself and scored an original piece for the sequence.[57]
Themes[edit source | edit]
This movie is widely recognized as a critique on society. It brings up very real issues that the world, and especially densely populated areas, are dealing with today and even more so in the future. Katherine Ellison asserts that “Americans produce nearly 400 million tons of solid waste per year but recycle less than a third of it, according to a recent Columbia University study.” Landfills are filling up so quickly that the UK may run out of landfill space by the year 2017.[58]
Environment and Waste[edit source | edit]
Because WALL-E overtly critiques consumerism, it also critiques Disney's production values and aesthetic, without being too obvious.[6] In the DVD commentary, Stanton said that he has been asked if it was his intention to make a movie about consumerism. His answer was it was not; it was a way to answer the question of how would the Earth get to the state where one robot would be left to continue the cleanup by itself.
In "WALL-E: from environmental adaption to sentimental nostalgia," Robin Murray and Joseph Heuman explain the important theme of nostalgia in this film. Nostalgia is clearly represented by human artifacts, left behind, that WALL-E collects and cherishes, i.e. Zippo lighters, hubcaps, and plastic sporks. These modern items that we use out of necessity, are made sentimental through the lens of the bleak future of Earth. Nostalgia is also expressed through the musical score, as the film opens with a camera shot of outer space that slowly zooms in to a waste filled Earth while playing "Put on Your Sunday Clothes," reflecting on simpler and happier times in human history. This film also expresses nostalgia through the longing of nature and the natural world, as it is the sight and feeling of soil, and the plant brought back to the space ship by EVE, that make the captain decide it is time for humans to move back to Earth. WALL-E expresses nostalgia also, by reflecting on heterosexual romantic themes of older Disney and silent films.[6]
Stanton describes the theme of the film as "irrational love defeats life's programming":[24]

I realized the point I was trying to push with these two programmed robots was the desire for them to try and figure out what the point of living was ... It took these really irrational acts of love to sort of discover them against how they were built ... I realized that that's a perfect metaphor for real life. We all fall into our habits, our routines and our ruts, consciously or unconsciously to avoid living. To avoid having to do the messy part. To avoid having relationships with other people. Of dealing with the person next to us. That's why we can all get on our cell phones and not have to deal with one another. I thought, 'That's a perfect amplification of the whole point of the movie.' I wanted to run with science in a way that would sort of logically project that.[24]
Technology[edit source | edit]
Stanton noted many commentators placed emphasis on the environmental aspect of humanity's complacency in the film, because "that disconnection is going to be the cause, indirectly, of anything that happens in life that's bad for humanity or the planet".[59] Stanton said that by taking away effort to work, the robots also take away humanity's need to put effort into relationships.[43] Christian journalist Rod Dreher saw technology as the complicated villain of the film. The humans' artificial lifestyle on the Axiom has separated them from nature, making them "slaves of both technology and their own base appetites, and have lost what makes them human". Dreher contrasted the hardworking, dirt covered WALL-E with the sleek clean robots on the ship. However, it is the humans and not the robots who make themselves redundant, and during the end credits humans and robots are shown working alongside each other to renew the Earth. "WALL-E is not a Luddite film," he said. "It doesn't demonize technology. It only argues that technology is properly used to help humans cultivate their true nature – that it must be subordinate to human flourishing, and help move that along."[60]

 

The Axiom and EVE have been compared to Noah's Ark and the dove in that story.
Christianity[edit source | edit]

Stanton, who is Christian,[12] named EVE after the Biblical character because WALL-E's loneliness reminded him of Adam, before God created his wife.[61] Dreher noted EVE's biblical namesake and saw her directive as an inversion of that story; EVE uses the plant to tell humanity to return to Earth and move away from the "false god" of BnL and the lazy lifestyle it offers. Dreher also noted this departure from classical Christian viewpoints, where Adam is cursed to labor, in that WALL-E argues hard work is what makes humans human. Dreher emphasized the false god parallels to BnL in a scene where a robot teaches infants "B is for Buy n Large, your very best friend", which he compared to modern corporations such as McDonald's creating brand loyalty in children.[60] Megan Basham of World magazine felt the film criticizes the pursuit of leisure, whereas WALL-E in his stewardship learns to truly appreciate God's creation.[12]
During writing, a Pixar employee noted to Jim Reardon that EVE was reminiscent of the dove with the olive branch from the story of Noah's Ark, and the story was reworked with EVE finding a plant to return humanity from its voyage.[62] WALL-E himself has been compared to Prometheus,[28] Sisyphus,[60] and Butades: in an essay discussing WALL-E as representative of the artistic strive of Pixar itself, Hrag Vartanian compared WALL-E to Butades in a scene where the robot expresses his love for EVE by making a sculpture of her from spare parts. "The Ancient Greek tradition associates the birth of art with a Corinthian maiden who longing to preserve her lover’s shadow traces it on the wall before he departed for war. The myth reminds us that art was born out of longing and often means more for the creator than the muse. In the same way Stanton and his Pixar team have told us a deeply personal story about their love of cinema and their vision for animation through the prism of all types of relationships."[63]
Reception[edit source | edit]
Release[edit source | edit]
Continuing a Pixar tradition, WALL-E was paired with a short film for its theatrical release, Presto. The film was dedicated to Justin Wright (1981–2008), a Pixar animator who had worked on Ratatouille and died of a heart attack before WALL-E's release.[7]
Walt Disney Imagineering (WDI) built animatronic WALL-Es to promote the picture, which made appearances at Disneyland Resort;[64] the Franklin Institute; the Miami Science Museum; the Seattle Center; and the Tokyo International Film Festival.[65] Due to safety concerns, the 318 kg robots were always strictly controlled and WDI always needed to know exactly what they were required to interact with. For this reason, they generally refused to have their puppets meet and greet children at the theme parks in case a WALL-E trod on a child's foot. Those who wanted to take a photograph with the character had to make do with a cardboard cutout.[66]
Very small quantities of merchandise were sold for WALL-E, as Cars items were still popular, and many manufacturers were more interested in Speed Racer, which was a successful line despite the film's failure at the box office. Thinkway, which created the WALL-E toys, had previously made Toy Story dolls when other toy producers had not shown an interest.[65] Among Thinkway's items were a WALL-E that danced when connected to a music player, a toy that could be taken apart and reassembled, and a groundbreaking remote control toy of him and EVE that had motion sensors that allowed them to interact with players.[67] There were even plushies.[68] The "Ultimate WALL-E" figures were not in stores until the film's home release in November 2008,[65] at a retail price of almost $200, leading The Patriot-News to deem it an item for "hard-core fans and collectors only".[67]
Box-office performance[edit source | edit]
WALL-E grossed $223,808,164 in the USA and Canada and $297,503,696 overseas for a worldwide total of $521,311,860, marking it the ninth highest grossing film of 2008.[2]
The film premiered at the Greek Theatre in Los Angeles on June 23, 2008.[69]
In the USA and Canada, it opened in 3,992 theaters on June 27, 2008. During its opening weekend, it topped the box office with $63,087,526[70] which is currently the fifth-best opening weekend for a Pixar film[71] and the fourth-best opening among films released in June.[72] The movie earned $94.7 million in its first week and crossed the $200 million mark during its sixth weekend.[73]
Countries where it grossed over $10 million are the following: Japan ($44,005,222), UK, Ireland and Malta ($41,215,600), France and the Maghreb region ($27,984,103), Germany ($24,130,400), Mexico ($17,679,805), Spain ($14,973,097), Australia ($14,165,390), Italy ($12,210,993) and Russia and the CIS ($11,694,482).[74]
Home media[edit source | edit]
The film was released by Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment on DVD and Blu-ray Disc on November 18, 2008. The various editions included Presto, a new short film BURN-E, the Leslie Iwerks documentary film The Pixar Story, shorts about the history of Buy n Large, the behind-the-scenes special features and a Digital Copy of the film that can be played through iTunes or Windows Media and compatible devices.[75] It sold 9,042,054 DVD units ($142,633,974) in total becoming the second best-selling animated DVD among those released in 2008 in terms of units sold (behind Kung Fu Panda), the best-selling animated feature in terms of sales revenue and the 3rd best-selling among all 2008 DVDs.[76]
Critical reception[edit source | edit]
WALL-E was met with overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics.[77] Rotten Tomatoes reported that 96% of critics gave the film positive reviews, based upon a sample of 236 reviews, with an average rating of 8.5/10.[78] At Metacritic, which assigns a normalized rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the film has received an average score of 94, based on 39 reviews, which represents "universal acclaim".[77] indieWire named WALL-E the third best film of the year, based on their annual survey of 100 film critics, while Movie City News shows that WALL-E appeared in 162 different top ten lists, out of 286 different critics lists surveyed, the most mentions on a top ten list of any film released in 2008.[79]
Richard Corliss of Time named WALL-E as his favorite film of 2008 (and later of the decade), noting the film succeeded in "connect[ing] with a huge audience" despite the main characters' lack of speech and "emotional signifiers like a mouth, eyebrows, shoulders [and] elbows". It "evoke[d] the splendor of the movie past" and he also compared WALL-E and EVE's relationship to the chemistry of Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn.[80] Other critics who named WALL-E as their favorite film of 2008 included Tom Charity of CNN,[81] Michael Phillips of the Chicago Tribune, Lisa Schwarzbaum of Entertainment Weekly, A. O. Scott of The New York Times, Christopher Orr of The New Republic, Ty Burr and Wesley Morris of The Boston Globe, Joe Morgenstern of The Wall Street Journal, and Anthony Lane of The New Yorker.[82]
Todd McCarthy of Variety called the film "Pixar's ninth consecutive wonder", saying it was imaginative yet straightforward. He said it pushed the boundaries of animation by balancing esoteric ideas with more immediately accessible ones, and that the main difference between the film and other science fiction projects rooted in an apocalypse was its optimism.[83] Kirk Honeycutt of The Hollywood Reporter declared that WALL-E surpassed the achievements of Pixar's previous eight features and probably their most original film to date. He said it had the "heart, soul, spirit and romance" of the best silent films. Honeycutt said the film's definitive stroke of brilliance was in using a mix of archive film footage and computer graphics to trigger WALL-E's romantic leanings. He praised Burtt's sound design, saying "If there is such a thing as an aural sleight of hand, this is it."[84]
Roger Ebert writing in the Chicago Sun-Times found WALL-E "an enthralling animated film, a visual wonderment, and a decent science-fiction story". Ebert said the scarcity of dialogue would allow it to "cross language barriers" in a manner appropriate to the global theme, and noted it would appeal to adults and children. He praised the animation, saying the color palette was "bright and cheerful [...] and a little bit realistic", and that Pixar managed to generate a "curious" regard for the WALL-E, comparing his "rusty and hard-working and plucky" design favorably to more obvious attempts at creating "lovable" lead characters. He said WALL-E was concerned with ideas rather than spectacle, saying it would trigger stimulating "little thoughts for the younger viewers."[85] He named it as one of his twenty favorite films of 2008 and argued it was "the best science-fiction movie in years".[86]
The film was interpreted as tackling a topical, ecologically-minded agenda,[78] though McCarthy said it did so with a lightness of touch that granted the viewer the ability to accept or ignore the message.[83] Kyle Smith of the New York Post, wrote that by depicting future humans as "a flabby mass of peabrained idiots who are literally too fat to walk", WALL-E was darker and more cynical than any major Disney feature film he could recall. He compared the humans to the patrons of Disney's Parks and Resorts, adding, "I'm also not sure I've ever seen a major corporation spend so much money to issue an insult to its customers."[87] Maura Judkis of U.S. News & World Report questioned whether this depiction of "frighteningly obese humans" would resonate with children and make them prefer to "play outside rather than in front of the computer, to avoid a similar fate".[88] The interpretation led to criticism of the film by conservative commentators such as Glenn Beck, and contributors to National Review Online including Shannen W. Coffin and Jonah Goldberg (although he admitted it was a "fascinating" and occasionally "brilliant" production).[89][not in citation given]
A few notable critics have argued that the film is vastly overrated,[90] claiming it failed to "live up to such blinding, high-wattage enthusiasm",[91] and that there were "chasms of boredom watching it", in particular "the second and third acts spiraled into the expected".[92] Other labels included "preachy"[90] and "too long".[91] Child reviews sent into CBBC were mixed, some citing boredom and an inadequate storyline.[93]
Patrick J. Ford of The American Conservative said WALL-E's conservative critics missed lessons in the film that he felt appealed to traditional conservatism. He argued that the mass consumerism in the film was not shown to be a product of big business, but of too close a tie between big business and big government: "The government unilaterally provided its citizens with everything they needed, and this lack of variety led to Earth's downfall." Responding to Coffin's claim that the film points out the evils of mankind, Ford argued the only evils depicted were those that resulted from losing touch with our own humanity and that fundamental conservative representations such as the farm, the family unit, and wholesome entertainment were in the end held aloft by the human characters. He concluded, "By steering conservative families away from WALL-E, these commentators are doing their readers a great disservice."[94]
Director Terry Gilliam praised the film as "A stunning bit of work. The scenes on what was left of planet Earth are just so beautiful: one of the great silent movies. And the most stunning artwork! It says more about ecology and society than any live action film – all the people on their loungers floating around, brilliant stuff. Their social comment was so smart and right on the button."[95]
Movie Room Reviews praised the film and gave it 4 stars saying "Plenty of sight gags and one-liners will keep audiences both young and old giggling, and the storyline is easy to follow, even for younger viewers."[96]
Accolades[edit source | edit]
Main article: List of accolades received by WALL-E
WALL-E won the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature and was nominated for Best Original Screenplay, Best Original Score, Best Original Song, Sound Editing, and Sound Mixing at the 81st Academy Awards, which it lost to Slumdog Millionaire (Original Score, Original Song, Sound Mixing), The Dark Knight (Sound Editing), and Milk (Original Screenplay).[97][98] Walt Disney Pictures also pushed for an Academy Award for Best Picture nomination,[99] but it was not nominated, provoking controversy as to whether the Academy deliberately restricted WALL-E to the Best Animated Feature category.[100] Peter Travers commented that "If there was ever a time where an animated feature deserved to be nominated for best picture it's Wall-E."[101] Only three animated films, 1991's Beauty and the Beast and Pixar's next two films, 2009's Up and 2010's Toy Story 3, have ever been nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture. A reflective Stanton stated he was not disappointed the film was restricted to the Best Animated Film nomination because he was overwhelmed by the film's positive reception, and eventually "The line [between live-action and animation] is just getting so blurry that I think with each proceeding year, it's going to be tougher and tougher to say what's an animated movie and what's not an animated movie."[17]
WALL-E made a healthy appearance at the various 2008 end-of-the-year awards circles, particularly in the Best Picture category, where animated films are often overlooked. It has won the award, or the equivalent of it, from the Boston Society of Film Critics (tied with Slumdog Millionaire),[102] the Chicago Film Critics Association,[103] the Central Ohio Film Critics awards,[104] the Online Film Critics Society,[105] and most notably the Los Angeles Film Critics Association, where it became the first animated feature to win the prestigious award.[106] It was named as one of 2008's ten best films by the American Film Institute and the National Board of Review of Motion Pictures.[107][108]
It won Best Animated Feature Film at the 66th Golden Globe Awards, 81st Academy Awards and the Broadcast Film Critics Association Awards 2008.[109][110] It was nominated for several awards at the 2009 Annie Awards, including Best Feature Film, Animated Effects, Character Animation, Direction, Production design, Storyboarding and Voice acting (for Ben Burtt);[111] but was beaten out by Kung Fu Panda in every category.[112] It won Best Animated Feature at the 62nd British Academy Film Awards, and was also nominated there for Best Music and Sound.[113] Thomas Newman and Peter Gabriel won two Grammy Awards for "Down to Earth" and "Define Dancing".[114] It won all three awards it was nominated for by the Visual Effects Society: Best Animation, Best Character Animation (for WALL-E and EVE in the truck) and Best Effects in the Animated Motion Picture categories.[115] It became the first animated film to win Best Editing for a Comedy or Musical from the American Cinema Editors.[116] In 2009, Stanton, Reardon and Docter won Nebula Award, beating The Dark Knight and the Stargate Atlantis episode "The Shrine".[117][118] It won Best Animated Film and was nominated for Best Director at the Saturn Awards.[119]
At the British National Movie Awards, which is voted for by the public, it won Best Family Film.[120] It was also voted Best Feature Film at the British Academy Children's Awards.[121] WALL-E was listed at #63 on Empire's online poll of the 100 greatest movie characters, conducted in 2008.[122] In early 2010, TIME ranked WALL-E #1 in "Best Movies of the Decade".[5]
References[edit source | edit]
1.Jump up ^ Brooks Barnes (2008-06-01). "Disney and Pixar: The Power of the Prenup". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-01-12.
2.^ Jump up to: a b "WALL-E (2008)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2009-10-05.
3.Jump up ^ "2009 Hugo Awards". The Hugo Awards. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
4.Jump up ^ "Nebula Award winners for 2008 announced". LOCUS. Retrieved September 4, 2012.
5.^ Jump up to: a b Corliss, Richard (2009-12-29). "WALL-E (2008) – Best Movies, TV, Books and Theater of the Decade". TIME. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
6.^ Jump up to: a b c Murray, Robin L.; Heumann, Joseph K. (Spring 2009). "WALL-E: From Environmental Adaptation to Sentimental Nostalgia". Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media. No. 51. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
7.^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x "Production notes". Walt Disney Pictures. Retrieved 2008-07-19.
8.^ Jump up to: a b DVD. Scene 16. "Captain on Deck". Audio commentary by Director Andrew Stanton. 52:01–52:09.
9.^ Jump up to: a b "WALL-E screenplay". Disney.com. Retrieved 2009-01-06. [dead link]
10.^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h Bill Desowitz (2008-04-07). "Stanton Powers Up WALL•E". Animation World Network. Retrieved 2008-11-23.
11.^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Tasha Robinson (2008-06-26). "Andrew Stanton". The A.V. Club. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
12.^ Jump up to: a b c Megan Basham (2008-06-28). "WALL-E world". World. Retrieved 2009-02-19.
13.Jump up ^ Jamie Portman (2008-06-25). "The last robot left has to put out the trash". The Vancouver Sun. Retrieved 2008-07-21.
14.^ Jump up to: a b c d "Andrew Stanton: Wall-E Q&A" (QuickTime audio). Creative Screenwriting. 2008-12-16. Retrieved 2009-01-04.
15.^ Jump up to: a b James White (April 2008). "How We Made WALL-E". Total Film. pp. 113–116.
16.Jump up ^ Hauser, p. 11.
17.^ Jump up to: a b Sarah Ball (2009-01-23). "Mr. Oscar, Tear Down This Wall! Andrew Stanton on How Animated Films are Pigeonholed – and How Wall-E is Every Man". Newsweek. Retrieved 2009-01-26.
18.^ Jump up to: a b c Marco R. della Cava (2008-06-24). "'WALL-E' focuses on its hero's heart". USA Today. Retrieved 2008-07-21.
19.Jump up ^ Alex Billington (2008-06-23). "Interview: Wall-E's Writer and Director Andrew Stanton". FirstShowing.net. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
20.Jump up ^ Title Animation Test, 2008 DVD, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
21.Jump up ^ James Hicks (2008-12-09). "The Science of 'Wall-E'". Variety. Retrieved 2009-01-13. [dead link]
22.Jump up ^ "James Hicks, Ecology & evolutionary biology professor".
Today@UCI. 2008-07-23. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
23.^ Jump up to: a b c d Deleted scenes with introductions by Andrew Stanton, 2008 DVD, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
24.^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Steve Fritz (2008-07-04). "How Andrew Stanton & Pixar Created WALL*E – Part II". Newsarama. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
25.^ Jump up to: a b c d Captain's Log: The Evolution of Humans, 2008 DVD featurette, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
26.Jump up ^ DVD. Scene 16. "Captain on Deck". Audio commentary by Director Andrew Stanton. 48:56–50:37.
27.^ Jump up to: a b c d Steve "Capone" Prokopy (2008-06-24). "Andrew Stanton Gives Up the Goods on WALL-E and JOHN CARTER to Capone!". Ain't It Cool News. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
28.^ Jump up to: a b c Joshua Starnes (2008-06-13). "WALL•E Writer/Director Andrew Stanton". ComingSoon.net. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
29.Jump up ^ Joanna Cohen (2008-09-17). "Andrew Stanton and Ben Burtt talk WALL-E". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2008-11-27.
30.Jump up ^ Derek Thompson (2008-07-17). "The Storyboards of WALL-E". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2008-11-27.
31.Jump up ^ Hauser, p. 39.
32.Jump up ^ Hauser, p. 71.
33.^ Jump up to: a b c d e Ron Barbagallo (January 2009). "Design With a Purpose: An interview with Ralph Eggleston". Animation Art Conservation. Retrieved 2009-02-12.
34.Jump up ^ Steven Horn and Eric Moro (2008-04-07). "Wall•E Preview". IGN. Retrieved 2008-11-23.
35.Jump up ^ Bill Desowitz (2008-06-27). "Hello, WALL•E!: Pixar Reaches for the Stars" (Printable version). Animation World Network. Retrieved 2009-02-14. [dead link]
36.^ Jump up to: a b Joe Utichi (2008-07-16). "The World of WALL-E". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2008-11-27.
37.^ Jump up to: a b Sheila Roberts. "Andrew Stanton Interview, WALL-E". MoviesOnline. Archived from the original on 2008-06-26. Retrieved 2008-01-12.
38.Jump up ^ Steve Fritz (2008-07-01). "How Andrew Stanton & Pixar Created WALL*E – Part I". Newsarama. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
39.^ Jump up to: a b c d e WALL-E and EVE, 2008 DVD, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
40.Jump up ^ Peter Hartlaub (2008-06-25). "Planet WALL-E". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
41.^ Jump up to: a b c d Joe Strike (2008-06-22). "'WALL-E' is a real character". New York Daily News. Retrieved 2008-07-19.
42.Jump up ^ Peter Debruge (2008-06-18). "How to build a better robot". Variety. Retrieved 2009-01-12.
43.^ Jump up to: a b Robo-everything, 2008 DVD featurette, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
44.Jump up ^ Hauser, p. 132.
45.Jump up ^ Tom Russo (2008-06-30). "Ben Burtt: The man behind R2-D2 and Wall-E's beeps". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
46.Jump up ^ Bob Thompson (2008-07-03). "Bet on Burtt to get the right Wall-E sounds". National Post. Retrieved 2008-11-03. [dead link]
47.Jump up ^ Associated Press (2008-06-28). "Voice of 'WALL-E': Robot sounds toddler-inspired". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
48.^ Jump up to: a b c d e Animation Sound Design: Building Worlds From The Sound Up featurette, 2008 DVD featurette, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
49.Jump up ^ "Q&A With WALL•E's Ben Burtt". Pixar Planet. 2008-11-13. Retrieved 2009-01-12.
50.^ Jump up to: a b List of a Shot: Deconstructing the Pixar Process, 2008 DVD featurette, Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
51.Jump up ^ Ben Burtt (2008-07-18). "WALL-E Sound Masterclass". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2008-11-27.
52.Jump up ^ Peter Hartlaub (2008-06-29). "All Ears on 'WALL-E'". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
53.Jump up ^ "ScoreKeeper Chats With Composer Thomas Newman!!". Ain't It Cool News. 2008-09-16. Retrieved 2008-09-17.
54.Jump up ^ Daniel Schweiger (2009-01-19). "E-notes: Thomas Newman gives a chilling workout in 'Revolutionary Road' and some robotic impulses in 'WALL-E'". iF Magazine. Retrieved 2009-01-20. [dead link]
55.Jump up ^ "Best Animated Feature Film Acceptance Speech". Oscar.com. Retrieved 2009-02-23.
56.Jump up ^ Chriss Willman (2008-07-10). "WALL-E Meets Dolly!". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2009-01-06.
57.Jump up ^ Andrew Stanton's Blu-ray and DVD audio commentary, 2008, Walt Disney Home Entertainment
58.Jump up ^ Ellison, Katherine (October 2008). "Talking Trash". Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 6, No. 8 (3): 456. Bibcode:1995SciAm.272c..24Y. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0395-24. JSTOR 20440969.
59.Jump up ^ Jonathan L'Ecuyer (2009-02-23). "An Oscar shout-out". Gloucester Daily Times. Retrieved 2009-03-03.
60.^ Jump up to: a b c Rod Dreher (2008-07-05). ""Wall-E": Aristotelian, crunchy con". Beliefnet. Retrieved 2009-01-15.
61.Jump up ^ Mark Moring (2008-06-24). "The Little Robot That Could". Christianity Today. Archived from the original on July 31, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-26.
62.Jump up ^ Hauser, p. 83.
63.Jump up ^ Hrag Vartanian (2008-10-21). ""Wall-E" as a Return to the Promise of Animation". His blog. Retrieved 2009-02-19.
64.Jump up ^ Peter Sciretta (2008-05-14). "Animatronic WALL-E Spotted in LA". /Film. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
65.^ Jump up to: a b c Jim Hill (2008-06-18). "When it comes to the retail world, Speed Racer whomps WALL-E". Jim Hill Media. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
66.Jump up ^ Jim Hill (2009-02-06). "Why For: isn't WALL•E rolling around the Disney theme parks yet?". Jim Hill Media. Retrieved 2009-02-07.
67.^ Jump up to: a b Kira L. Schleiter (2008-06-22). "Off-the-wall gimmicks keep Wall-E in view". The Patriot-News. Retrieved 2008-07-19.
68.Jump up ^ Peter Sciretta (2008-05-24). "Cool Stuff: Thinkway’s WALL-E Toys". /Film. Retrieved 2009-01-13.
69.Jump up ^ "Disney-Pixar's WALL-E World Premiere Saturday, June 21 at the Greek Theatre". Reuters. 2008-06-20. Retrieved 2009-01-12.
70.Jump up ^ "WALL-E (2008) – Weekend Box Office Results". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2008-06-29.
71.Jump up ^ "Pixar Movies". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2008-06-29.
72.Jump up ^ "Top June Opening Weekends". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2011-02-23.
73.Jump up ^ McClintock, Pamela (2008-08-03). ""Dark Knight" narrowly slays "Dragon"". Variety. Retrieved 2008-12-19.
74.Jump up ^ "WALL-E (2008) – International Box Office Results". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2011-02-13.
75.Jump up ^ Peter Sciretta (2008-10-31). "3-Disc Special Edition of WALL-E". /Film. Retrieved 2009-01-22.
76.Jump up ^ "WALL-E". boxofficemojo.com. Retrieved 2011-04-19.
77.^ Jump up to: a b "WALL-E: Reviews". Metacritic. CNET Networks, Inc. Retrieved 2008-08-04.
78.^ Jump up to: a b "WALL-E Movie Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2012-07-05.
79.Jump up ^ David Poland (2008). "The 2008 Movie City News Top Ten Awards". Retrieved 2009-01-13. [dead link]
80.Jump up ^ Richard Corliss (2008-12-09). "Top 10 Movies". Time. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
81.Jump up ^ Tom Charity (2008-12-31). "The best (and worst) films of 2008". CNN. Retrieved 2009-01-08.
82.Jump up ^ "Metacritic: 2008 Film Critic Top Ten Lists". Metacritic. Retrieved 2008-12-30. [dead link]
83.^ Jump up to: a b Todd McCarthy (2008-06-26). "WALL-E Review". Variety. Archived from the original on 2008-08-22. Retrieved 2008-06-26.
84.Jump up ^ Kirk Honeycutt (2006-06-25). "WALL-E". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 2008-06-30. Retrieved 2008-06-26.
85.Jump up ^ Roger Ebert (2008-06-26). "WALL-E review". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved 2008-06-30.
86.Jump up ^ Roger Ebert (2008-12-05). "The best films of 2008... and there were a lot of them". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
87.Jump up ^ Kyle Smith (2008-06-26). "Disney's "Wall-E": A $170 Million Art Film". kylesmithonline.com. Retrieved 2008-07-01.
88.Jump up ^ Maura Judkis (2008-06-30). "Will 'WALL-E' Make Us Greener?". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 2008-07-02.
89.Jump up ^ Ali Frick (2008-07-01). "Right-Wing Apoplectic Over Pixar’s WALL-E: 'Malthusian Fear Mongering,' 'Fascistic Elements'". Think Progress. Center for American Progress. Retrieved 2008-07-01.
90.^ Jump up to: a b Daniel Treiman (2008-07-10). "Thumbs Up for 'Wall-E'? Ed Kooch Dissents". The Forward. Retrieved 2009-10-06.
91.^ Jump up to: a b "/ UK – Everyday tale of droid meets probe". Ft.com. 2008-07-17. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
92.Jump up ^ Matthew Odam (2008-07-25). "Is ‘Wall-E’ overrated?". Austin American-Statesman blogs. Retrieved 2009-10-06. [dead link]
93.Jump up ^ "Film review: WALL-E". CBBC. 2008-10-01. Retrieved 2009-10-06.
94.Jump up ^ Patrick J. Ford (2008-06-30). "WALL-E's Conservative Critics". The American Conservative (Ron Unz). Retrieved 2008-07-02. [dead link]
95.Jump up ^ Time Out's 50 greatest animated films: part 2. Time Out London.
96.Jump up ^ "Summer Movie Showdown: "WALL-E" Review". Movie Room Reviews. Retrieved 2013-05-17.
97.Jump up ^ "The 81st Academy Awards (2009) Nominees and Winners". oscars.org. Retrieved 2011-11-22.
98.Jump up ^ "Oscars 2009: The nominees". BBC News Online. 2009-01-22. Retrieved 2009-01-22.
99.Jump up ^ Michael Cieply, Brooks Barnes (2008-10-27). "Studios Are Pushing Box Office Winners as Oscar Contenders". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-10-28.
100.Jump up ^ Bandyk, Matthew (2009-01-22). Academy Awards Controversy: Wall-E Gets Snubbed For Best Picture Oscar. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 2009-01-22.
101.Jump up ^ Academy accused of snubbing Dark Knight, Wall-E. ABC News. 2009-01-22. Retrieved 2009-01-22.
102.Jump up ^ Peter Sciretta (2008-12-14). "AFI’s Top 10 Movies of 2008; Boston Critics Name WALL-E and SlumDog Best Picture". /film. Retrieved 2008-12-15.
103.Jump up ^ Chicago Film Critics Association (2008-12-18). "WALL-E Cleans Up Chicago Film Critics Awards". Retrieved 2008-12-18.
104.Jump up ^ Frank Gabrenya (2009-01-10). "'WALL-E' picks up top honors". The Columbus Dispatch.
105.Jump up ^ "Online film critics back Wall-E". BBC News Online. 2009-01-20. Retrieved 2009-01-20.
106.Jump up ^ Justin Chang (2008-12-09). "L.A. critics wired for 'WALL-E'". Variety. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
107.Jump up ^ Hayes, Dade (2008-12-14). "NBR names 'Slumdog' best of year". Variety. Retrieved 2009-01-13. [dead link]
108.Jump up ^ "AFI Awards 2008". American Film Institute. Retrieved 2009-01-12. [dead link]
109.Jump up ^ "HFPA – Nominations and Winners". Goldenglobes.org. Retrieved 2009-01-13. [dead link]
110.Jump up ^ Dade Hayes (2008-12-09). "Critics Choice favors 'Milk,' 'Button'". Variety. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
111.Jump up ^ "2008 Annie Award Nominations by Category". Annie Awards. Retrieved 2008-12-02. [dead link]
112.Jump up ^ Pete DeBruge (2009-01-30). "'Kung Fu Panda' rules Annie Awards". Variety. Retrieved 2009-01-31.
113.Jump up ^ Emily Phillips (2009-02-08). "Slumdog Bags The BAFTAs". Empire Online. Retrieved 2009-02-08.
114.Jump up ^ "51st Grammy Awards". Grammy.com. Archived from the original on 2009-02-07. Retrieved 2009-02-09.
115.Jump up ^ Thomas J. McLean (2009-02-22). "Button, WALL•E Dominate VES Awards". Animation Magazine. Retrieved 2009-02-23.
116.Jump up ^ "59th Annual ACE Eddie Awards". American Cinema Editors. Retrieved 2009-02-16. [dead link]
117.Jump up ^ "2008 Nebula Award Ballot". Nebula Award. Archived from the original on March 4, 2009. Retrieved 2009-03-03.
118.Jump up ^ Silver, Steven H (2009-04-26). "Nebula Winners". SF Site News (SF Site). Retrieved 2009-04-27.
119.Jump up ^ "Nominations for the 35th Annual Saturn Awards". Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films. Retrieved 2009-03-17.
120.Jump up ^ "National Movie Awards". Archived from the original on August 22, 2008. Retrieved 2009-01-12.
121.Jump up ^ Post your opinion. "Children's Awards Winners – Children's – Awards – The BAFTA site". Bafta.org. Retrieved 2009-01-08.
122.Jump up ^ "The 100 Greatest Movie Characters". Empire Online. Retrieved 2009-01-12.

Further reading[edit source | edit]
•Hauser, Tim (2008). The Art of WALL-E. San Francisco: Chronicle Books. ISBN 978-0-8118-6235-6. OCLC 377889575.

External links[edit source | edit]
 Wikimedia Commons has media related to: WALL-E
 Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: WALL-E
•Official website
•WALL-E at the Internet Movie Database
•WALL-E at the TCM Movie Database
•WALL-E at the Big Cartoon DataBase
•WALL-E at AllRovi
•WALL-E at Box Office Mojo
•WALL-E at Rotten Tomatoes
•WALL-E at Metacritic


[show]
•v
•t
•e

WALL-E
 
Music
Soundtrack
"Down to Earth"

 

Shorts
Presto
BURN-E

 

Related
Characters WALL-E
EVE

Video game
Accolades

 


[show]
•v
•t
•e

Films by Andrew Stanton
 
Written and directed
Finding Nemo (2003)
WALL-E (2008)
John Carter (2012)
Finding Dory (2016)

 

Written only
Toy Story (1995)
A Bug's Life (1998, also co-director)
Toy Story 2 (1999)
Monsters, Inc. (2001)
Toy Story 3 (2010)

 


[show]
•v
•t
•e

John Lasseter
 
Directed


Feature films
Toy Story (1995)
A Bug's Life (1998)
Toy Story 2 (1999)
Cars (2006)
Cars 2 (2011)

 


Short films
Luxo Jr. (1986)
Red's Dream (1987)
Tin Toy (1988)
Knick Knack (1989)
Mater and the Ghostlight (2006)
Cars Toons: Mater's Tall Tales (2008)


 

Produced


Feature films
Secret of the Wings (2012)
Frozen (2013)
Inside Out (2015)
The Good Dinosaur (2015)

 


Short films
Luxo Jr. (1986)


 

Written


Feature films
Toy Story (1995)
A Bug's Life (1998)
Toy Story 2 (1999)
Cars (2006)
Toy Story 3 (2010)
Cars 2 (2011)
Planes (2013)

 


Short films
Luxo Jr. (1986)
Red's Dream (1987)
Tin Toy (1988)
Knick Knack (1989)
Mater and the Ghostlight (2006)


 

Studios
Walt Disney Animation Studios
Pixar
DisneyToon Studios

 


[show]
•v
•t
•e

Pixar
 
Feature films


Released
Toy Story (1995)
A Bug's Life (1998)
Toy Story 2 (1999)
Monsters, Inc. (2001)
Finding Nemo (2003)
The Incredibles (2004)
Cars (2006)
Ratatouille (2007)
WALL-E (2008)
Up (2009)
Toy Story 3 (2010)
Cars 2 (2011)
Brave (2012)
Monsters University (2013)

 


Forthcoming
Inside Out (2015)
The Good Dinosaur (2015)
Finding Dory (2016)


 

Shorts


Original
Luxo Jr. (1986)
Red's Dream (1987)
Tin Toy (1988)
Knick Knack (1989)
Geri's Game (1997)
For the Birds (2000)
Boundin' (2003)
One Man Band (2005)
Lifted (2006)
Presto (2008)
Partly Cloudy (2009)
Day & Night (2010)
La Luna (2011)
The Blue Umbrella (2013)

 


Feature-related
Mike's New Car (2002)
Jack-Jack Attack (2005)
Mater and the Ghostlight (2006)
Your Friend the Rat (2007)
BURN-E (2008)
Dug's Special Mission (2009)
George & A.J. (2009)
Hawaiian Vacation (2011)
Small Fry (2011)
Partysaurus Rex (2012)
The Legend of Mor'du (2012)
Party Central (2014)

 


Short series
Cars Toons (2008–)
Toy Story Toons (2011–)


 

Franchises
Toy Story (1995–)
Monsters, Inc. (2001–)
Finding Nemo (2003–)
Cars (2006–)

 


Associated
productions

The Adventures of André and Wally B. (1984)
1906 (TBA)

 

Compilations
Tiny Toy Stories (1996)
Pixar Short Films Collection, Volume 1 (2007)
Pixar Short Films Collection, Volume 2 (2012)

 

Documentaries
The Pixar Story (2007)

 

Products
Pixar Image Computer
RenderMan
Marionette

 

People
John Lasseter
Edwin Catmull
Steve Jobs
Alvy Ray Smith
Jim Morris
Pete Docter
Andrew Stanton
Brad Bird
Lee Unkrich
Gary Rydstrom
Brenda Chapman
Brad Lewis
Bob Peterson
Joe Ranft
Mark Andrews
Doug Sweetland
Ronnie del Carmen
Dan Scanlon

 

See also
List of Pixar characters
List of Pixar awards and nominations (feature films
shorts)
List of Pixar film references
Woody's Roundup
Buzz Lightyear of Star Command (The Adventure Begins)
Lucasfilm Animation
Circle 7 Animation
Pixar Canada
Industrial Light & Magic
A Computer Animated Hand
Planes
The Pixar Theory

 


[show] 
Awards for WALL-E

 


[show]
v
t
e

Academy Award for Best Animated Feature
 
Shrek – Aron Warner (2001)
Spirited Away – Hayao Miyazaki (2002)
Finding Nemo – Andrew Stanton (2003)
The Incredibles – Brad Bird (2004)
Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit – Steve Box and Nick Park (2005)
Happy Feet – George Miller (2006)
Ratatouille – Brad Bird (2007)
WALL-E – Andrew Stanton (2008)
Up – Pete Docter (2009)
Toy Story 3 – Lee Unkrich (2010)
Rango – Gore Verbinski (2011)
Brave – Brenda Chapman and Mark Andrews (2012)

 


[show]
v
t
e

BAFTA Award for Best Animated Film
 
2006–present
Happy Feet (2006)
Ratatouille (2007)
WALL-E (2008)
Up (2009)
Toy Story 3 (2010)
Rango (2011)
Brave (2012)

 


[show]
v
t
e

Golden Globe Award for Best Animated Feature Film
 
2006–present
Cars – John Lasseter (2006)
Ratatouille – Brad Bird (2007)
WALL-E – Andrew Stanton (2008)
Up – Pete Docter (2009)
Toy Story 3 – Lee Unkrich (2010)
The Adventures of Tintin – Steven Spielberg (2011)
Brave – Mark Andrews & Brenda Chapman (2012)

 


[show]
v
t
e

Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form
 
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2003)
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2004)
The Incredibles (2005)
Serenity (2006)
Pan's Labyrinth (2007)
Stardust (2008)
WALL·E (2009)
Moon (2010)
Inception (2011)
Game of Thrones (season 1) (2012)
The Avengers (2013)

 


[show]
v
t
e

Nebula Award for Best Script/Bradbury Award (2001–present)
 
Nebula Award for Best Script
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon – James Schamus, Kuo Jung Tsai and Hui-Ling Wang (2001)
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring – Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens & Peter Jackson (2002)
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers – Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Stephen Sinclair & Peter Jackson (2003)
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King – Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens & Peter Jackson (2004)
Serenity – Joss Whedon (2005)
Howl's Moving Castle – Hayao Miyazaki, Cindy Davis Hewitt and Donald H. Hewitt (2006)
Pan's Labyrinth – Guillermo del Toro (2007)
WALL-E – Andrew Stanton, Jim Reardon and Pete Docter (2008)

 

Ray Bradbury Award for
Outstanding Dramatic Presentation

2000X — Tales of the Next Millennia – Yuri Rasovsky and Harlan Ellison (2001)
Joss Whedon (2008)
District 9 – Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell (2009)
Inception – Christopher Nolan (2010)
Doctor Who: "The Doctor's Wife" – Neil Gaiman & Richard Clark (2011)

 

Complete list
(1973–2000)
(2001–present)

 


[show]
v
t
e

Satellite Award for Best Animated or Mixed Media Feature
 
The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)
Men in Black (1997)
A Bug's Life (1998)
Toy Story 2 (1999)
Chicken Run (2000)
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)
Spirited Away (千と千尋の神隠し) (2002)
The Triplets of Belleville (Les triplettes de Belleville) (2003)
The Incredibles (2004)
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (2005)
Pan's Labyrinth (El laberinto del fauno) (2006)
Ratatouille (2007)
WALL-E (2008)
Fantastic Mr. Fox (2009)
Toy Story 3 (2010)
The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn (2011)
Rise of the Guardians (2012)

 


[show]
v
t
e

Saturn Award for Best Animated Film
 
Watership Down (1978)
The Secret of NIMH (1982)
Spirited Away (2002)
Finding Nemo (2003)
The Incredibles (2004)
Tim Burton's Corpse Bride (2005)
Cars (2006)
Ratatouille (2007)
WALL-E (2008)
Monsters vs. Aliens (2009)
Toy Story 3 (2010)
Puss in Boots (2011)
Frankenweenie (2012)



 

This is a good article. Click here for more information.

  <img src="//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:CentralAutoLogin/start&type=1x1" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" style="border: none; position: absolute;" />
Retrieved from "
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WALL-E&oldid=573437254"

Categories: •2008 films
•English-language films
•WALL-E
•2000s adventure films
•2000s romantic comedy films
•2000s science fiction films
•2008 animated films
•American romantic comedy films
•American satirical films
•American science fiction films
•Animated science fiction films
•BAFTA winners (films)
•Best Animated Feature Academy Award winners
•Best Animated Feature BAFTA winners
•Best Animated Feature Broadcast Film Critics Association Award winners
•Best Animated Feature Film Golden Globe winners
•Comedy science fiction films
•Dystopian films
•Environmental films
•Fictional robots
•Films directed by Andrew Stanton
•Films featuring anthropomorphic characters
•Films set in the 29th century
•Films with live action and animation
•Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form winning works
•Nebula Award for Best Script winning works
•Pixar animated films
•Post-apocalyptic films
•Robot films
•Solitude in fiction
•Space adventure films

Hidden categories: •All articles with dead external links
•Articles with dead external links from May 2013
•Articles with dead external links from October 2010
•Articles with dead external links from September 2010
•Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages
•All articles with unsourced statements
•Articles with unsourced statements from April 2010
•Articles with unsourced statements from April 2013
•Commons category template with no category set
•Commons category with page title same as on Wikidata
•Good articles


Navigation menu

Personal tools
•Create account
•Log in


Namespaces
•Article
•Talk


Variants


Views
•Read
•Edit source
•Edit
•View history


Actions

Search

 Search  


Navigation
•Main page
•Contents
•Featured content
•Current events
•Random article
•Donate to Wikipedia
•Wikimedia Shop


Interaction
•Help
•About Wikipedia
•Community portal
•Recent changes
•Contact page


Toolbox
•What links here
•Related changes
•Upload file
•Special pages
•Permanent link
•Page information
•Data item
•Cite this page


Print/export
•Create a book
•Download as PDF
•Printable version


Languages

•العربية
•Azərbaycanca
•Български
•Brezhoneg
•Català
•Česky
•Cymraeg
•Dansk
•Deutsch
•Eesti
•Ελληνικά
•Español
•فارسی
•Français
•Galego
•한국어
•हिन्दी
•Ido
•Bahasa Indonesia
•Italiano
•עברית
•ქართული
•Lietuvių
•Magyar
•Македонски
•Bahasa Melayu
•Nederlands
•日本語
•Norsk bokmål
•Plattdüütsch
•Polski
•Português
•Română
•Runa Simi
•Русский
•Simple English
•Slovenčina
•Српски / srpski
•Suomi
•Svenska
•தமிழ்
•ไทย
•Türkçe
•Українська
•Tiếng Việt
•中文
•Edit links

• This page was last modified on 18 September 2013 at 02:08.
•Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
 Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
•Privacy policy
•About Wikipedia
•Disclaimers
•Contact Wikipedia
•Developers
•Mobile view
•Wikimedia Foundation
•Powered by MediaWiki